Good follow up to The theoretical Minimum?

AI Thread Summary
Self-teaching physics can be rewarding, and starting with "The Theoretical Minimum" by Leonard Susskind provides a solid foundation. For a follow-up, "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David J. Griffiths is a strong choice, especially when paired with the third volume of the Feynman Lectures on Physics, which offers valuable insights into quantum physics. However, it's crucial to assess your mathematical background, particularly in calculus and linear algebra, as these subjects are essential for understanding advanced physics concepts. Comfort with classical mechanics and the Hamiltonian formalism is also important, as these topics will be revisited in more advanced texts. To ensure a comprehensive understanding, it's recommended to solidify your math skills and work through exercises in Susskind's book, as merely reading may not lead to true comprehension. Supplementary materials like Boas' "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" and Taylor's "Classical Mechanics" can further enhance your readiness for quantum mechanics.
Jonnathan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm currently self teaching myself physics and I have never seen physics before this. The book that I'm using is The Theoretical Minimum - What You Need to Know to Start Doing Physics by Leonard Susskind. I plan to be finished with the book by mid next week and my question is what's a good follow up?

I'm extremely interested in quantum physicist and would like to learn it so I'm considering Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J. Griffiths and I would learn that accompanied by the third volume from the Feynman Lectures on Physics which I've read has a lot of good information on Quantum physics is that a viable follow up? Or will the material be to advanced for me?

If it's to advanced what would you recommend that I learn before I start on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How's your math? Do you know calc I, II and III? Do you know linear algebra (not just matrices, but vector spaces and such)?

Are you comfortable with classical mechanics and the Hamiltonian formalism?
 
One of the later lectures in the book covers Hamiltonians I haven't gotten to that lecture yet but after a quick scan it seems to be pretty detailed I should be pretty comfortable with them by the time I finish that lecture if not I'll study them more in depth. I'm comfortable with calc, but I've never sen linear algebra although I do know vectors.
 
If you really want to be working through the more advanced texts, it's important that you are comfortable with the previous material at the level where you can solve a good amount of textbook problems. Susskind's book is fine, but I think it might only give an illusion of understanding unless you make sure to work out the exercises and seek out other sources as well. To really learn the material in there, first make sure that your calculus I-III, differential equations and linear algebra skills are damn solid. For this a commonly cited source is Boas' "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences". Then if you already know Newtonian Mechanics, go through Taylor's "Classical Mechanics", focusing on Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, and Zettili's "Quantum Mechanics".
 
Last edited:
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top