Good problem but uncertain WHY

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Robokapp
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical problem involving the optimization of areas formed by cutting a string into two pieces, one for a square and one for an equilateral triangle. Participants explore the reasoning behind the minimal and maximal area configurations, as well as a related thought experiment about the implications of increasing the circumference of the Earth by a small amount.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant solved the problem but questioned why the minimum area occurs when approximately 4.45 meters of the string is allocated to the square, rather than the triangle.
  • Another participant suggested that having more shapes may lead to less efficient use of string, using the example of circles to illustrate how area changes with perimeter.
  • A later reply introduced a thought experiment about increasing the equator of the Earth by 1 meter and questioned whether a cat could pass between the original and new circumference, emphasizing the complexity of visualizing such scenarios.
  • Further clarification was provided regarding the relationship between the length of the chain and the resulting height above the Earth's surface, noting that the height is approximately 0.16 meters.
  • One participant reflected on the difficulty of visualizing the problem despite its simplicity, highlighting the disconnect between mathematical reasoning and intuitive understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and agreement on the mathematical reasoning behind the area optimization problem, with some proposing explanations while others challenge or refine those ideas. The thought experiment regarding the Earth's circumference also introduces additional complexity, with no clear consensus on the implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about geometric properties and the limitations of intuitive reasoning in complex mathematical scenarios. There are unresolved aspects regarding the visualization of large-scale geometric relationships.

Robokapp
Messages
218
Reaction score
0
Okay... i did solve it, but i wonder why the answer is what it is.


"a string 10 m long is cut in 2 so that one piece forms one square and one piece forms an equlateral triangle". HOw do you cut it so the total area obtained is minimalized...and part b. maximalized?

For maximalized i got that everything must go into the square, which makes sense...because at a given perimeter the area is bigger in a polygon with a larger number of sides, of course. But the minimum comes out to be at about 4.45 (if i remember right) meters into the square. Now...why isn't everything going into the triangle? I got some equations but I don't know how to write them in the 'cool way' so i won't even bother.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the whole purpose of mathematics. When we have a situation that's a bit far too complex to analyze intuitively at all steps, we let the math do the work.

If there is any explanation at all, having more shapes will definitely waste more string. Each new shape requires some 'start-up'. Let's take an example of two circles versus one circle.

Let us choose a rope of length C, then it's radius and area are:

[tex]R = \frac{C}{2\pi}, A = \pi (\frac{C}{2\pi})^2 = \frac{1}{4} \frac{C^2}{\pi}[/tex]

Now if we cut this C in half and distribute it among two circles instead:

[tex]R = \frac{C}{4\pi}, A = 2 \times \pi (\frac{C}{4\pi})^2 = 2 \times \frac{1}{16} \frac{C^2}{\pi} = \frac{1}{8} \frac{C^2}{\pi}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
That is one beautiful explanation. That was truly great. Thank you. It makes sense now.

Well, I got one problem for you that pretty much proves your point. It was shown to me by my dad. Common sense can not help you...it's too out of proportion for someone's mind to understand it without thinking of a few formulas.

"if you increase the equator of Earth by 1 meter and you place the new circle so the two circles are circumcentrics, will a cat be eable to pass in between them and come out alive?

Circles are in same plane...no 3-d stuff.
 
Last edited:
Robokapp said:
"if you increase the equator of Earth by 1 meter and you place the new circle so the two circles are circumcentrics, will a cat be eable to pass in between them and come out alive?

Well, not "increase the equator of the earth", but make a chain 1 meter longer than the circuference of the Earth and put it around the Earth so that its center is at the center of the earth.

If the radius of the Earth is R, then its circumference is [itex]2\pi R[/itex]. That means the length of the chain is [itex]2\pi R+ 1[/itex] and that is the circumference of a circle with radius [itex]\frac{2\pi R+ 1}{2\pi}= R+\frac{1}{2\pi}[/itex]. That is, it will be [itex]\frac{1}{2\pi}[/tex] meter off the earth. That is about 0.16 m or 16 cm. How tall is your cat?[/itex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
Well, not "increase the equator of the earth", but make a chain 1 meter longer than the circuference of the Earth and put it around the Earth so that its center is at the center of the earth.
If the radius of the Earth is R, then its circumference is [itex]2\pi R[/itex]. That means the length of the chain is [itex]2\pi R+ 1[/itex] and that is the circumference of a circle with radius [itex]\frac{2\pi R+ 1}{2\pi}= R+\frac{1}{2\pi}[/itex]. That is, it will be [itex]\frac{1}{2\pi}[/tex] meter off the earth. That is about 0.16 m or 16 cm. How tall is your cat?[/itex]
[itex] <br /> :D it's smaller than that. Don't forget they can crawl.<br /> <br /> But what I'm trying to point out is even if it's a simple problem a 10th grader can solve with basic geometry, it's impossible to picture in your head. The rings are too big to comprehend the space in between them as anything but "tiny" which you don't know how much it means compared to real life sizes.<br /> <br /> I thought it's a good problem. It is similar to your 'starting point" thing. At least in my mind it makes sense and connection.<br /> <br /> WEll, thank you.<br /> ~Robokapp[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
230K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K