Goodbye Forum: Why I'm Leaving Despite Enjoying It

  • Thread starter Thread starter oneamp
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The forum member expresses disappointment with the moderation style of an operator named Evo, citing a recent thread closure as indicative of a lack of understanding and ability. They argue that Evo's moderation is based more on social connections than on competence, leading to frustration among users. The member appreciates the forum's commitment to real science over pseudo-science, acknowledging the challenges of moderating such discussions. They mention a preference for StackExchange for programming issues, despite its voting system not being ideal for complex scientific topics. Ultimately, the member decides to leave the forum, feeling their concerns are not adequately addressed.
oneamp
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
I am no old school member, but I have enjoyed the forum until now.

Before this thread is deleted, I will tell you why.

Evo, an op, has closed a thread recently without understand it or even reading it. It's not the first time she's done this. The last time she did it to me, it was re opened. It is obvious to me that she has op status not due to any abilities or knowledge of hers, but due to her social network. Someone without ability moderating is very annoying.

I'm gone. I'm sure I won't be missed, and that's fine. This sort of problem doesn't seem to exist as much on stack exchange, and there's more people using that anyway.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How could you possibly know any of the things you assert?
 
It is very likely you do not appreciate how difficult a job moderating a forum is.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Not knowing why your thread was closed, I'm pretty sure that Evo had a very good reason to close it. When its happened to me, I asked her and got some real insight into why.

In one case, I was giving out medical advice based on personal experience not realizing the possible state of the OP and why they were asking the question. Evo explained the liabilities that PF might be subject to if something were to happen. I was thankful she caught it.

In other cases, I've seen PF cancel threads because of questionable science topics. You can't have a forum that discusses real science and pseudo science together and not have students confused about which is which. PF has decidedly chosen to stay on the real science side and avoid these types of traps that can bring in all manner of alternative and personal theories.

Enjoy StackExchange, I use it from time to time for programming issues mostly but it uses a different mechanism from moderators by letting people vote on answers which doesn't always work well in the science/math arena.

Take for example the Monty Hall problem, popular voting would wind up with the wrong answer drowning out the right one which takes a great deal of thought to convince yourself that its indeed right.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks for the feedback. This is a fluid situation and we'll update when we have one. Thanks! :)
 
Sorry oneamp, I had deleted my original post and in my haste it appears my closing remark was confusing. Any time that you have a question you can PM me or hit the report button and ask for clarification. I am saddened that closing the thread upset you so much, it certainly was not my intention.

I have updated my response to be clearer as to why the thread was closed.

Evo said:
Sorry, but we can't discuss random websites.

Please see Travis_King's post, I deleted the link to the website, sorry, I should have explained that. Just because someone posts something on the internet doesn't mean it makes sense and is worthy of discussion here, as has been pointed out. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
101
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top