GR Text: Zee's Formulas & Where I'm Going Wrong

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dm4b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas Gr Text
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a potential misunderstanding of Zee's formulas in General Relativity (GR), specifically regarding the differentiation of the determinant of the metric tensor. The key equation established is log det M = tr log M, leading to the differentiation steps involving the determinant of the metric g. The final expression indicates a possible oversight in the trace operation applied to the last term, where the determinant of the metric tensor is explicitly maintained throughout the derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with matrix calculus
  • Knowledge of determinants and traces in linear algebra
  • Experience with differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in matrix calculus
  • Learn about the trace operator in linear algebra
  • Explore the implications of metric tensors in General Relativity
  • Review differentiation techniques for scalar and matrix functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on General Relativity and differential geometry, will benefit from this discussion.

dm4b
Messages
363
Reaction score
4
It seems like Zee lost a trace in his new GR text, but I am sure it is me confusing things.

First, he establishes:

[itex] log\: det\: M = tr\: log\: M[/itex]

Then, differentiating:

[itex] (det\: M)^{-1} \: \partial (det\: M)=\partial (tr\: log\: M)=tr(\partial\: log\: M)=tr(M^{-1}\partial M)[/itex]

Then he applies to the metric, giving:

[itex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial _{\nu }\sqrt{-g}=\frac{1}{2g}\partial _{\nu }g=\frac{1}{2}\partial _{\nu }log\: g[/itex]

where g is the determinant of the metric.

Sure seems like he lost a trace on the very last term. Where I am going wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In Zee's equation, ##g## means the determinant of the metric tensor. In more explicit notation, the steps are

##\frac{1}{\sqrt{-\det g}} \partial_\nu \sqrt{-\det g} = \frac{1}{2 \det g} \partial_\nu (\det g) = \frac{1}{2} \partial_\nu ({\rm tr} \log g) = \frac{1}{2} \partial_\nu (\log \det g)##

In what I've written here, ##g## is always a matrix and the determinant is kept explicit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K