Grabbing something at Terminal Velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the physics of falling at terminal velocity and the potential consequences of grabbing a solid, horizontal pole. It concludes that the force exerted upon impact would likely dislocate or severely injure the arms, if not cause fatal injuries. The scenario of catching oneself on a rigid structure while falling is deemed unrealistic, as the sudden stop would result in catastrophic damage to the body. The conversation highlights the discrepancies between Hollywood portrayals of survival in falls and the actual physics involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of terminal velocity and its implications
  • Basic knowledge of physics, particularly force and impact dynamics
  • Familiarity with human anatomy and injury mechanics
  • Awareness of cinematic physics versus real-world physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of terminal velocity and its effects on the human body
  • Study impact forces and injury mechanisms in high-velocity falls
  • Explore real-life survival stories from falls and the conditions that contributed to survival
  • Analyze the portrayal of physics in film and compare it with scientific principles
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, stunt coordinators, filmmakers, and anyone interested in the intersection of physics and cinematic realism.

akhmed966
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I know in Hollywood people fall a couple stories and grab onto a pole or something and survive, which most of the time doesn't seem too far fetched. But what if you were falling at terminal velocity and grabbed onto a horizontal pole? (The pole being a cantilever, and not flexible or anything at all, like a real world scenario)

Suppose if you grabbed onto it with both arms, would the force just rip your arms off, or just dislocate your arms and actually survive it?

What if you caught it between your chest, and wrapped your arms around it, parallel to the bar. I assume the force would still be fatal, and cause more damage since all the force will be undistributed. Would it be like grabbing a sword or something and just rip right through you or would you actually survive it.

If neither of these ways are possible, is there a way to survive without the pole being flexible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only falls people survive at terminal velocity are into something that gives quite a bit. Dense bushes, deep snow, that sort of thing. Anything that stops any part of your body more or less instantly is sure to be fatal.
 
akhmed966 said:
I know in Hollywood people fall a couple stories and grab onto a pole or something and survive, which most of the time doesn't seem too far fetched.

Actually, it does if you think about it. The force of an adult male weighing, say 180lbs falling 3 stories and grabbing a solid railing is certainly enough to dislocate his shoulder even if he could manage to hang on, which I think is likely impossible since hands aren't that strong.

The damage that the heroes sustain, and more or less casually walk away from, in movies is usually completely ridiculous.
 
Wow, haha. Never thought about this topic before but is certainly very intriguing.

One of my assignments in high school physics class was to watch a movie and note all of the "physics is broken" moments. Haha.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K