Weight in an elevator, at terminal velocity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of weight experienced in an elevator that is falling at terminal velocity. Participants explore the implications of gravitational forces, acceleration, and the effects of air resistance on perceived weight, considering both theoretical and practical aspects of the scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that during free fall, individuals would feel weightless, while questioning if this sensation persists at terminal velocity.
  • One participant argues that the scale in the elevator would read the same weight as when standing on the ground, suggesting a free body diagram to illustrate this point.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the laws of physics are consistent in inertial reference frames, asserting that one would not notice a difference between being in a falling elevator and a stationary one.
  • A participant notes that air resistance inside the elevator is insufficient to prevent acceleration, leading to a scenario where individuals would eventually hit the floor and register weight.
  • There is a discussion about whether an orbiting space capsule experiences acceleration despite having constant orbital speed, with some clarification provided on circular motion and its implications for perceived gravity.
  • One participant contends that an elevator cannot truly free fall due to its design, explaining the role of the counterweight and its effects on weight perception during descent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the sensation of weight in a falling elevator, particularly at terminal velocity. While some argue that weight is felt, others suggest that weightlessness is experienced. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the influence of air resistance and gravitational changes with altitude, but these factors are not fully resolved within the discussion. The implications of circular motion and the mechanics of elevator design are also noted as relevant but not conclusively addressed.

cowmoo32
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
There's a discussion on reddit about an elevator not just in free fall, but at terminal velocity. I know that at the moment the elevator starts to fall, you would feel weightless. But does this hold true for terminal velocity as well? You have stopped accelerating, so you are experiencing a pull downward by gravity just as you would standing on the ground. Does the scale read your weight? The consensus is yes, but I can't help but think you would feel weightless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignoring the slight change in gravitational acceleration with altitude, the scale would read the same weight it would read when you stand on it on the ground. Draw a free body diagram.
 
The laws of physics are the same in all inertial* reference frames. So it would be impossible to distinguish being in this box falling at a constant speed (relative to the Earth's surface) from being in a box that is stationary (relative to the Earth's surface). In fact, you could claim with equal validity that you were stationary and that the Earth's surface was moving up towards you. This is a key idea behind the special theory of relativity.

So, no. You would not notice anything different in this elevator falling at a constant speed than you would in an elevator sitting on the ground.

*non-accelerating, basically
 
The air is exerting a force that is equal and opposite to the force of gravity exerted on the elevator. However the speed of the air INSIDE the elevator RELATIVE TO YOU is so small that it would be unable to provide enough air resistance to stop your acceleration. As a result, the elevator stops accelerating, but you don't, so you eventually will hit the floor and weigh in.

Hope that made sense.
 
Got it, thanks.
 
I understand initially everyone would be flloating in the elevator like astronauts in an orbiting space capsule.But is an orbiting space capsule considered accelelerating even though its orbital speed is constant? Is this why it has zero gravity?
 
Yes, the capsule is accelerating. Any object that moves in circles is accelerating; remember, acceleration perpendicular to velocity doesn't increase the velocity but it does change the direction. This is exactly what happens with circular motion and orbits.
 
Nobody is going to float like astronauts in an elevator because an elevator's design makes it physically impossible to free fall. The counterweight typically weighs a little more than the elevator, so if all control mechanisms were to let loose, the counterweight would fall down and the elevator would rise. So until it found its terminal velocity, you would weigh more than normal and not less.

When you descend normally in an elevator, the control mechanism is hoisting up on the counterweight. But it is possible to overload an elevator, such that its total weight exceeds that of the counterweight by a little bit. In that case, if all control and holding mechanisms were to fail at the same time, you would descend slowly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K