Grad school preparation: Should I take a probability class?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a student preparing for graduate school in applied mathematics should take a formal probability class, given their background in physics and previous exposure to probability concepts. The scope includes considerations for graduate school applications and the value of formal coursework in probability and statistics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes their extensive background in probability through physics courses and questions the necessity of taking a formal probability class.
  • Another participant argues that if graduate schools recommend a probability course, it is wise to heed that advice.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the participant's prior high school statistics class may not be sufficient preparation for graduate-level work.
  • Some participants emphasize that taking a formal probability class could reinforce existing knowledge and provide a more rigorous understanding of the subject.
  • It is mentioned that the physics curriculum often lacks depth in probability and statistics, which could be a disadvantage for applicants to applied mathematics programs.
  • One participant shares their personal experience, stating that the probability learned informally is often superficial compared to formal coursework.
  • Another participant expresses a personal decision to take the probability class in the upcoming semester.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that taking a formal probability class could be beneficial for the student's application and understanding, but there is no consensus on whether it is strictly necessary given the student's background.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the potential limitations of the undergraduate physics curriculum in covering probability and statistics comprehensively, suggesting that the student may not have encountered all relevant concepts in their previous studies.

tjackson3
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
I am (hopefully!) going to be entering grad school in the fall. I will be going for a PhD in applied mathematics. Many grad schools recommend that you take a course in probability before entering (it is strongly hinted that doing so will improve your odds of admission). Here's where the wrinkle comes in. I'm double majoring in math and physics. Within the physics department, I have had several classes that utilized and derived probability distributions (e.g. quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics). As a result, I've had a good deal of probability in my time as an undergraduate. In addition, I took AP Statistics waaaay back in my junior year of high school, so I've had a "formal" statistics class. Here is the course description of my school's Introduction to Probability class (listed as Statistics 4321, so it's an upper level course):

Introduction to the theory of probability, counting rules, conditional probability, independence, additive and multiplicative laws, Bayes Rule. Discrete and continuous random variables, their distributions, moments and moment generating functions. Multivariate probability distributions, independence, covariance. Distributions of functions of random variables, sampling distributions, central limit theorem

The only thing in this description that I have not had in some class or another is moments and moment generating functions. So my question is: Should I take this formal probability class in order to show that I've had it and maybe learn a couple of things I didn't know before but largely hit on topics I've already covered, or should I take a different class? Moreover, would not taking this class damage my grad school applications?

Thanks so much for your opinions!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If grad schools are explicitly saying that it helps your application, who are we to contradict them?
 
tjackson3 said:
In addition, I took AP Statistics waaaay back in my junior year of high school, so I've had a "formal" statistics class.

All due respect to your high school teachers, I don't think this counts. :smile:

tjackson3 said:
or should I take a different class? Moreover, would not taking this class damage my grad school applications?

Is there some reason you *don't* want to take probability? What would you take instead?

The course looks quite good to me, ideas in statistics will surely come in useful at some point if you're studying an applied subject. Not only that, I'd say that probability/statistics are both underestimated/understudied/under-appreciated by undergraduate students in general, at least it is in my experience within the UK. Unless there's some dream course you'd be missing out on in place of this one, I say take it. There's no harm in reinforcing the ideas you've learned in physics from a mathematicians point of view, and you may well have to take another probability/stats class in grad school so this would be good preparation.
 
If you have a physics undergraduate and are applying to a Ph.D. in applied math, then it will help your application a lot if you have coursework in probability and statistics. Probability and statistics is something that is extremely weak in the undergraduate physics curriculum.

Part of the reason I think (and the admissions committees) seem to think that a course on probability and statistics would be useful is that you learn what it is that you don't know.
 
Jack21222 said:
If grad schools are explicitly saying that it helps your application, who are we to contradict them?

+1

fasterthanjoao said:
All due respect to your high school teachers, I don't think this counts.

+1

I have a PhD in physics, and I have taken several probability classes offered by mathematics departments. There is no comparison. The probability you pick up along the way is a) very superficial, and b) lacking in rigor and proofs.
 
Yes, take Probability. I'm taking it in the Spring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K