Gradient vs. Directional Derivative

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the gradient and the directional derivative in the context of calculus, particularly in relation to their definitions and properties in various mathematical frameworks, including vector calculus and differential geometry. Participants explore the implications of these concepts in both Euclidean and non-Euclidean spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the gradient is a vector that indicates the direction of maximum rate of change, while the directional derivative is a scalar that represents the rate of change in a specified direction.
  • Others argue that the magnitude of the gradient can be viewed as a specific example of a directional derivative when considering the direction of the gradient itself.
  • It is noted that the gradient is not a vector in the general sense, especially on manifolds where perpendicularity is not defined, and is instead characterized as a 1-form.
  • Some participants highlight that the differential of a function does not require an inner product, whereas the gradient does, depending on the context of the inner product defined on the tangent space.
  • There is a discussion about the representation of the gradient in coordinate systems and how it relates to the differential, with some participants emphasizing the generalization of the gradient concept to spaces without a metric.
  • One participant mentions that the gradient can be seen as the dual of the differential with respect to a metric, while others question the terminology used for these concepts.
  • Several participants express differing views on whether the gradient should be considered a specific example of the directional derivative or vice versa.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between the gradient and the directional derivative, with multiple competing views remaining on how these concepts should be defined and understood in various mathematical contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations in definitions and assumptions regarding the gradient and directional derivative, particularly in relation to the presence or absence of an inner product and the implications for different mathematical structures.

1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
On a quiz, a true/false statement was given along the lines of:

"The gradient is a specific example of a directional derivative."


I marked "true" and got it wrong. I see why, I think, since the gradient is an actual "guide," a vector, towards the max rate of change, while the directional derivative is a scalar value given some direction.

However, would it be correct to say that the magnitude of the gradient IS a specific example of a directional derivative?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't take the gradient of a function f in a particular direction, you simply take its gradient, df. On the other hand, given a vector v, you can find the rate a which f changes along that vector: df(v).
 
The object df contains information about the rate of change of f in all directions.
 
1MileCrash said:
On a quiz, a true/false statement was given along the lines of:

"The gradient is a specific example of a directional derivative."I marked "true" and got it wrong. I see why, I think, since the gradient is an actual "guide," a vector, towards the max rate of change, while the directional derivative is a scalar value given some direction.

However, would it be correct to say that the magnitude of the gradient IS a specific example of a directional derivative?

yes. it is is the directional derivative in the direction of the vector that is gradient divided by its length, i.e. in the direction of the unit vector that points in the same direction as the gradient vector.

The definition of the gradient is df(X) = <gradf,X>

The unit vector is gradf/|gradf| so the directional derivative is <gradf,gradf/|gradf|>

= (1/|gradf|)<gradf,gradf> = |gradf|.BTW: df, the differential of f, is not the gradient of f. It is not even a vector. It is a 1 form.

When you have a metric, i.e. an inner product, then there is always a vector,Y, that satisfies the equation df(X) = <Y,X> for all X. Y is the gradient of f with respect to this metric.

If you think about it, it will be clear that you do not need the idea of an inner product to take a directional derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
The gradient is not a vector. In three dimensional vector calculus, the gradient of a function is represented by a vector perpendicular to the level surfaces of the function at that point, but this is not possible on a general manifold, where there is no notion of perpendicularity. The gradient is in fact a 1-form.
 
dx said:
The gradient is not a vector. In three dimensional vector calculus, the gradient of a function is represented by a vector perpendicular to the level surfaces of the function at that point, but this is not possible on a general manifold, where there is no notion of perpendicularity. The gradient is in fact a 1-form.

This is really a semantic point but in all of the books I have ever read the gradient requires an inner product on the tangent space as do other operators such as the Laplacian of a function.

The differential df of a function does not require an inner product. So for each df there is a different gradient for each different inner product. Otherwise put, the graident is the dual of the differential with respect to the inner product.
 
A function defined on a smooth manifold has a gradient, even though the tangent spaces of the manifold have no inner product. The gradient of f in coordinate representation is

df = f,i dXi

where dXi are the gradients of the coordinate functions p → Xi(p). This object contains information about how f varies in all directions. Given a vector v, the directional derivative of f in the direction v is given by the action of the 1-form df on the vector v.
 
Last edited:
dx said:
A function defined on a smooth manifold has a gradient, even though the tangent spaces of the manifold have no inner product. The gradient of f in coordinate representation is

df = f,i dXi

where dXi are the gradients of the coordinate functions p → Xi(p). This object contains information about how f varies in all directions. Given a vector v, the directional derivative of f in the direction v is given by the action of the 1-form df on the vector v.

In all of the books I have read,df ,what you are calling the gradient, they call the differential.

The gradient is the vector which is dual to the differential with respect to a metric.

I will be happy to send you some differential geometry books that go over this.BTW: what do you call the dual of the differential if you do not call it the gradient?
 
Yes it is called the differential too, also exterior derivative. But the fact remains, it is the generalization of the gradient operator of vector calculus to general spaces which do not necessarily have an inner product. The idea of a gradient of a function makes sense in spaces that have no metric. It only requires the linear/affine structure.
 
  • #10
dx said:
Yes it is called the differential too, also exterior derivative. But the fact remains, it is the generalization of the gradient operator of vector calculus to general spaces which do not necessarily have an inner product. The idea of a gradient of a function makes sense in spaces that have no metric. It only requires the linear/affine structure.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient

here is the first sentence of the link.

"In vector calculus, the gradient of a scalar field is a vector field that points in the direction of the greatest rate of increase of the scalar field, and whose magnitude is that rate of increase."

Note that the gradient is a vector field and has a magnitude.
 
  • #11
Yes, in vector calculus. My point is simply that vector calculus is a formalism that only works in three dimensional euclidean space. The notion of gradient is more general.
 
  • #12
The concepts are the same on any manifold. In Euclidean space, the domain of vector analysis, the gradient is the dual of the differential of a function with respect to the standard metric.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
"The gradient is a specific example of a directional derivative."

I'd be more inclined to say that the directional derivative is a specific example of the gradient, grad . n
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K