Gravitation and Motion Equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sobeita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Motion
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
Sobeita
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The standard equation for motion is:

X= .5 * ax * t^2 + vx * t (+ cx)
Y= .5 * ay * t^2 + vy * t (+ cy)

...and of course, you can expand it to include more axes and more orders if you like.

Gravitation is a force, but to use it in the motion equation, you need it in acceleration form.

Fg= G * mM / r^2;
F= m*a; Ag = Fg/m;
Ag= G * M / r^2.

But if you use substitution, using Ag, the motion equation is still always parabolic, despite what we know about orbits. The cause is obviously the presence of the "r" variable, which is dependent on the position of the object (so that acceleration changes based on its position, and that position affects the acceleration, and both change continuously.)

With an iterative approach, I am able to approximate motion due to gravitation. The result is essentially a long string of parabolas.

Is there a way to combine these two equations, Ag and motion, into a true unified equation?
 
on Phys.org
Sobeita said:
The standard equation for motion is:

X= .5 * ax * t^2 + vx * t (+ cx)
Y= .5 * ay * t^2 + vy * t (+ cy)
These equations only apply to motion with constant acceleration; they are not true in general.
 
That was more or less the purpose of posting this question. Is there an equation that can calculate motion due to gravitation, without using some sort of sigma iteration approach?