Gravitational attraction force b/w point mass and rod

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational attraction force between a point mass and a thin rod of mass, exploring the mathematical approach to calculate this force. Participants examine the geometry of the situation, the integration process, and the implications of using the center of mass in the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes an approach using the formula F = -(GM1M2)/(s^2) and attempts to integrate over the length of the rod.
  • Another participant questions the geometry of the situation, asking how the rod is oriented with respect to the point mass.
  • A different participant suggests that the force should be calculated using the distance to the center of mass of the rod, leading to a different expression for the gravitational force.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the integration method used and seek clarification on how to correctly apply it.
  • There is a claim that the approach taken by one participant is standard in electromagnetic texts, suggesting a precedent for the method used.
  • One participant acknowledges the validation of their approach after receiving confirmation from others in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct method to calculate the gravitational force, with some supporting the integration approach while others advocate for using the center of mass. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the geometry and the integration process, which may affect the outcomes of the calculations. The dependence on the definitions of distance and mass distribution is also noted.

Redoctober
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
I was wondering about a scenario where we have a unit mass M1 and a thin rod of mass M2 of length L with a distance r between them attracting each other . Is my following approach to the problem correct ??!

let s = r + L
I know that F= -(GM1M2)/(s^2) where G is gravitation constant

therefore F= -GM1*∫1/(s^2).dM2
I know that M2 = λ*L where λ is density
therefore dM2 = λdL . from ds = dL
I get dM2 = λdL
Therefore finally , F= -GM1*∫1/(s^2)*λ.ds
Integrating from r to r+L
I get F= -(GM1M2)/(r*(r+L))

Equation analysis - If i put limit L-->0 , i turn the rod to a point mass, therefore i get -GM1M2/(r^2) which is actually the gravitational attraction force for two masses :D

Thanks in advance :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should describe the geometry of the situation. How is the rod oriented with respect to the point?
 
mathman said:
You should describe the geometry of the situation. How is the rod oriented with respect to the point?

Point mass --> . <------distance R------> _______________ <-- Rod M2 with length L
 


The force should be
F = G\frac{M_1M_2}{(r+\frac{L}{2})^2}
So something went wrong there.
 
I knew there was something wrong, maybe take the variable or the partition set i took for integrating.May you show me how you did it ?? :) thanks
 
Well the gravitational force between two points is F = G\frac{M_1M_2}{r^2} where r is the separation of the two points. Secondly in gravity the force between a point and an entire system is the same as the force between that point and the center of mass of that system (giving the center of mass the entire mass of the system), since the center of mass of a uniform rod is in the middle I added half the distance of the rod to the distance between your particle and the start of the rod to find the r term.
 
Oh i see , Center of mass does represent all the dm in the system so simply we can take distance as r+L/2, But if we were to proof it using the idea of F=-(GM1)/(s^2)*ΣdM2 thus F=-(GM1)/(s^2)∫1.dM2 ? How can it be done ?
 
Redoctober is right, and JHamm is wrong. You must integrate just as Red did.
This is a standard problem in EM texts for the electric force on a charge.
The texts all give Red's answer.
 
clem said:
Redoctober is right, and JHamm is wrong. You must integrate just as Red did.
This is a standard problem in EM texts for the electric force on a charge.
The texts all give Red's answer.

Oh k . Thankyou so much for vertifying :D ! I am happy that my approach to the problem worked !
 
  • #10
Sorry about that then, looks like I'll be eating foot tonight :s
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
988
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K