Gravitational Binding Energy in GR

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of gravitational binding energy in General Relativity (GR) specifically for spherically symmetric cases. Participants explore various formulations and assumptions related to the binding energy of static stars and the implications of different density distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the gravitational binding energy as ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}})##, where ##m## is the mass of the body, ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius, and ##R## is the area radius.
  • Another participant suggests that for a spherically symmetric static star, the binding energy can be expressed as ##E = M_p - M##, where ##M_p## is the total proper mass and ##M## is the total mass of the star.
  • A later post questions whether a constant density interior was assumed in the calculations, indicating the need for more information to clarify the scenario.
  • One participant seeks to find the GR equivalent of the Newtonian binding energy formula ##-\frac{GMm}{r}## and derives a modified expression involving ##k=\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}##.
  • Another participant references MTW's gravitation, noting that their formula for binding energy does not converge for the described case and suggests that a Taylor series expansion of MTW's formula indicates it yields values greater than the Newtonian result, potentially leading to infinity when ##r=0##.
  • They provide a detailed expression from MTW's work, highlighting the dependence of density on the equation of state and the function of mass within a radius, which complicates the binding energy calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate formulation of gravitational binding energy in GR, with no consensus reached on the correct approach or assumptions regarding density distributions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions made about density profiles and the specific conditions under which the binding energy is calculated. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the definitions used in GR, particularly regarding mass and density in relation to the Schwarzschild solution.

StateOfTheEqn
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
What is the gravitational binding energy in GR in the spherically symmetric case?

I calculate ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}})##

where ##m## is the mass of the body, ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius, and ##R## is the area radius as in the Birkhoff theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a spherically symmetric static star it is ##E = M_p - M## where ##M_p## is the total proper mass of the star and ##M## is the total mass of the star.
 
StateOfTheEqn said:
What is the gravitational binding energy in GR in the spherically symmetric case?

I calculate ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}})##

where ##m## is the mass of the body, ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius, and ##R## is the area radius as in the Birkhoff theorem.

We need a bit more information, were you assuming a constant density interior?
 
pervect said:
We need a bit more information, were you assuming a constant density interior?

We can assume the mass of a star is concentrated at a single point and a body of mass ##m## is a distance ##R## from the point. The binding energy is the energy required to move the body of mass ##m## from ##R## to infinity.

Essentially I am asking what is the GR counterpart to the Newtonian formula ##-\frac{GMm}{r}##.

In my calculations I derived ##E=mc^2(1-\frac{1}{k})## where ##k=\sqrt{1-\frac{r_s}{R}}## and ##r_s## is the Schwarzschild radius.
 
MTW's gravitation has a formula for binding energy on pg 604, but their formula won't converge for the case which you describe. Certainly if you plug 0 into the Newtonian formula you won't get a finite binding energy.

Note: MTW's expression uses geometric units, where G=1.

I believe a taylor series expansion of MTW's formula will show that it gives an answer which is always greater than the Newtonian one, so I don't see how you can get any value other than infinity when r=0.

MTW's formula:
-\int_0^r \rho \left[ \left( 1-2m/r \right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} -1 \right] \,4 \pi r^2 dr

##\rho## is the density, which in general a function of r that depends on the equation of state of whatever is composing the mass. m is not the total mass, but the mass inside radius r, so it's also a function of r. ##\rho## is the proper density, i.e. the density in a locally Minkowskii frame.

[add]
## m(r) = \int 4 \pi r^2 \rho dr## see pg 603. This equation for m(r) is only valid in Schwarzschild coordinates.

Taylor expansion for m/r < 1
-\int_0^r \rho \left[ \frac{1}{2} \frac{2m}{r} + \frac{3}{8} \left( \frac{2m}{r} \right) ^2 + \frac{5}{16} \left( \frac{2m}{r} \right)^3 + ... \right] 4 \pi r^2 dr<br />

If you take only the first term of the taylor series expansion, you get the Newtonian result.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K