Gravitational Force: Position Formula for Object Attracted

Click For Summary
To create a formula for the position of an object under gravitational attraction, the discussion outlines the use of gravitational force equations and integration techniques. The object, starting from rest at a distance greater than the planet's radius, experiences acceleration defined by F = GM/r². By integrating the acceleration with respect to time, an implicit equation for the object's position as a function of time is derived. The collision time can also be calculated using specific relations involving arctangent functions. However, inverting this expression to find time as a function of position is deemed complex and likely impossible with elementary functions.
disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
Hi.

How can one create a formula for the position of a object attracted by a gravitational force?
Assume we have a large planet with radius r_0 and mass M, whose position almost does not change) and an object r_1 such that r_1 > r_0 units away from the center of the planet.

The objects initial speed is zero. The acceleration the object experience at a distance r such that r_1>r>r_0 is F=\frac{GM}{r^2}, where G is the gravitational constant. Now I have tried numerous ways to create a position formula for this object given only the starting distance r_1, but I have not found one. Do you have any hints for a way to find one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you have:
\frac{d^{2}\tau}{dt^{2}}=-\frac{GM}{\tau^{2}}
Multiply this with the velocity, and integrate from t=0, to some arbitrary time t, and we get:
\frac{1}{2}(\frac{d\tau}{dt})^{2}-\frac{1}{2}*0^{2}=\frac{GM}{\tau}-\frac{GM}{\tau_{1}}
Noting that the velocity must be negative, we may simplify to:
\frac{d\tau}{dt}=-\gamma\sqrt{\frac{\tau_{1}-\tau}{\tau},\gamma=\sqrt{\frac{2GM}{\tau_{1}}}
We may separate this, introduce the dummy variable "x", and get:
\int_{\tau_{1}}^{\tau(t)}\sqrt{\frac{x}{\tau_{1}-x}}dx=-\gamma{t} (*)
By setting
u=\sqrt{\frac{x}{\tau_{1}-x}},x=\tau_{1}\to{u}=\infty,x=\frac{\tau_{1}u^{2}}{1+u^{2}},\frac{dx}{du}=\frac{2u}{(1+u^<br /> {2})^{2}}
We may rewrite the integral on the left-hand-side as follows:
\int_{\tau_{1}}^{\tau(t)}\sqrt{\frac{x}{\tau_{1}-x}}dx=-\tau_{1}\int_{x=\tau(t)}^{u=\infty}\frac{2u^{2}du}{(1+u^{2})^{2}}=-\tau_{1}(\arctan(u)-\frac{u}{1+u^{2}}\mid_{x=\tau(t)}^{u=\infty})=-\tau_{1}(\frac{\pi}{2}-\arctan(\sqrt{\frac{\tau(t)}{\tau_{1}-\tau(t)}})+\frac{\sqrt{\tau(t)(\tau_{1}-\tau(t))}}{\tau_{1}})
Inserting this into the left-hand side of (*) yields an implicit equation for the sought function \tau(t)

Note that we may readily find the collision time, tc:
t_{c}=\frac{\tau_{1}^{\frac{3}{2}}}{\sqrt{2GM}}(\frac{\pi}{2}-\arctan(\sqrt{\frac{\tau_{0}}{\tau_{1}-\tau_{0}}})+\frac{\sqrt{\tau_{0}(\tau_{1}-\tau_{0})}}{\tau_{1}})
Using the relation:
\arctan(\frac{y}{x})+\arctan(\frac{x}{y})=\frac{\pi}{2}, we get:
t_{c}=\frac{\tau_{1}^{\frac{3}{2}}}{\sqrt{2GM}}(\arctan(\sqrt{\frac{\tau_{1}-\tau_{0}}{\tau_{0}}})+\frac{\sqrt{\tau_{0}(\tau_{1}-\tau_{0})}}{\tau_{1}})
 
Last edited:
This was more than I asked for, thank you! Really clever to integrate with respect to r, and not t in equation 4 (which I did, and ended up with a similar equation with an arctan term. Differentiating would give a quartic equation with (dr/dt) as variable, and constant coefficients except the last term, which was a linear function of time. Solving for this would be hard, and even harder to integrate)

Now you really solved for time with respect to r, the inverse would perhaps be hard to achieve? (if even possible, looking at the complex formula I'd say it's impossible)
 
Last edited:
Indeed it would be hard to invert this expression, meaning you probably can't express the inverse through any finite combination of elementary functions.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K