Gravitational Force, the derivative of Gravitational Potential Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the relationship between gravitational force and gravitational potential energy, specifically whether the gravitational force is the derivative of gravitational potential energy. The equation for gravitational potential energy is presented, and its derivative with respect to distance shows that it equates to gravitational force. The conversation shifts to the pioneer anomaly, which refers to an unexplained acceleration that could affect calculations of gravitational forces and the sun's mass. The participants question the implications of incorporating the pioneer anomaly into gravitational calculations, noting that if it exists, it may challenge previous estimates of solar mass. Ultimately, the primary assertion that gravitational force is the derivative of gravitational potential energy is affirmed, while the implications of the pioneer anomaly remain uncertain.
kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
For the equation:

U=\frac{-GMm}{h}

Where h is the distance between the center of masses M and m.

In Calculus, they teach you derivatives.
The derivative of U with respect to h is:

dU=d\left(\frac{-GMm}{h}\right)
dU=\frac{GMm}{h^2}

Which is the gravitational force.

Were I to apply this knowledge to the pioneer anomaly, I would deduce that the gravitational potential energy would be equal to the integral of the force with respect to h:

g_{pioneer}=8.74*10^{-10}\frac{m}{s^2}
dU=\frac{GMm}{h^2}+mg_{pioneer}
dU=d\left(\frac{-GMm}{h}+mg_{pioneer}h\right)
U=\frac{-GMm}{h}+mg_{pioneer}h

Are my premises true?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear what you are trying to do. For one thing, the pioneer anomaly refers to an unexplained residual acceleration after all known forces (like gravity from known masses) have been accounted for.
 
Main point:
Is the Gravitational Force the derivative of Gravitational Potential Energy?

A motive:
In case if this is correct, this would be provide information of its truth.

Secondary (following) point:
Is the main point still true if the pioneer anomalous acceleration is added into the acceleration due to gravity? Note that if the pioneer anomaly exists, it invalidates previous estimates of the sun's mass.

A motive:
In case if this is false, this would be provide information of its falsity.
 
Last edited:
kmarinas86 said:
Main point:
Is the Gravitational Force the derivative of Gravitational Potential Energy?
Yes.

Secondary (following) point:
Is the main point still true if the pioneer anomalous acceleration is added to the acceleration due to gravity?
Again, no idea what you are doing here.
Note that if the pioneer anomaly exists, it invalidates previous estimates of the sun's mass.
Only if you assume that the unexplained acceleration is due to the gravitational attraction of the sun.

Are you trying to model the additional solar mass needed to account for the anomalous acceleration? If so, no need to work so hard. If the sun had an extra mass \Delta M, the additional acceleration would be:
\Delta g = \frac{G \Delta M}{h^2}

where h is the distance from the sun's center to the pioneer.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top