Gravitational Forces on the Edge of a Disk

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the gravitational forces experienced when standing on the edge of a massive disc-shaped object, akin to an Alderson disk. Participants explore the gravitational pull towards the center of the disk, noting that the gravitational force at the center is greater than at the edge. Key equations are provided, including the Newtonian surface gravity formula and integrals for calculating downward and lateral forces. The analysis concludes that a person would initially fall towards the center but could potentially stabilize at a certain distance from the edge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and fields
  • Familiarity with Newtonian physics
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly integration
  • Concept of an Alderson disk and its implications in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and implications of Alderson disks in astrophysics
  • Learn about gravitational field calculations for various geometries
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in physics
  • Investigate the effects of mass distribution on gravitational forces
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in gravitational mechanics and advanced mathematical modeling.

LENIN
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
What if we had a large and massive object shaped like a disc (look at the attachment) and we would walk on its edge. If we would step on the flat part what would happen?

P.S. I am going on holidays for a fe days so i won't be abel to check out your answers very soon.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Just how big is your disk? Are you considering the G field OF the disc? If it's big enough to create a G field sticking you together, it'll probably fall apart.

If the disk is small enough to be on earth, and you're talking about the Earth's G, you can simply try this on a merry-go-round!
 
I don't understand you diagram, could you elaborate.
 
LENIN said:
What if we had a large and massive object shaped like a disc (look at the attachment) and we would walk on its edge. If we would step on the flat part what would happen?
You would probably be drawn toward the center of the disk, i.e. there might be a component of the gravitational force parallel to the surface of the disk and directed towards the center. But to really determine this you'd have to calculate it. This is just an educated guess.

Pete
 
LENIN said:
What if we had a large and massive object shaped like a disc (look at the attachment) and we would walk on its edge. If we would step on the flat part what would happen?

P.S. I am going on holidays for a fe days so i won't be abel to check out your answers very soon.

I'm not sure what your diagram means either, but it sounds like you may be describing an Alderson disk?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alderson_disk

If we put the disk in the x-y plane, gravity will point roughly in the z direction if one is not too close to the edge of the disk.

The Newtonian surface gravity at the center of an infinite thin disk, with a density \rho kg/m^2 will be 2*Pi*G*\rho. For an infinite disk, the gravity will not change with height, for a finite disk the gravity will start to drop off eventually.
 
I will try to explain more precisaly. The basic idea is that you are standing on the edg of a large disk. Something the saize of a planet. Than at some moment you jump from the edg to the surfec. The question I am asking is will you fall towerds the canter, or will you be abel to stand on the sufec of the disk close to the edg.

P.S I hope this diagrem will be easyer to understand.
 

Attachments

Common sense would say that you would fall to the center since there is no "edge" to stop you.

Is this a simplified model of what you think gravity is? A 2D "Earth" vs. 3D "gravity" is what I imagine here.
 
LENIN said:
I will try to explain more precisaly. The basic idea is that you are standing on the edg of a large disk. Something the saize of a planet. Than at some moment you jump from the edg to the surfec. The question I am asking is will you fall towerds the canter, or will you be abel to stand on the sufec of the disk close to the edg.

At the center of the disk, there will be some local acceleration pulling you straight down. Call this value 'g'.

At the edge of the disk, this force will be less, but will rapidly increase as you move towards the center. Modelling the situation as being some height h above an infinitely dense disk, the downwards force will be approximated by (and greater than)

<br /> g \left( 1-{\frac {1}{\sqrt {1+{\frac {{d}^{2}}{{h}^{2}}}}}} \right) <br />

where you've moved a distance d towards the center of the disk

The force pulling you towards the center of the disk will be approximated by (and less than)

<br /> \frac {g}{\pi}\ln \left( {\frac {D}{d}} \right) <br />

where d is as before your distance from the edge, and D is the total diameter of the disk.

So this means you'll fall some distance, then stop, I'd need some more details to tell you exactly how far you'd fall.
 
Last edited:
The last equation should be
<br /> \frac {g}{\pi}\ln \left( {\frac {D}{d}} \right) <br />

I can't seem to get the latex to edit. (If a moderator fixes this problem, this post can be deleted).
 
  • #10
Thanks pervect
 
  • #11
how do you guys know what equations to us? it's like the concept and math changes according to the shape of an object.
 
  • #12
zynko said:
how do you guys know what equations to us? it's like the concept and math changes according to the shape of an object.

Here's what I did - note the analysis is only approximate.

First off, I modeled the disk as being infinitely thin and infinitely dense, to get rid of the third dimension.

For the first part of the problem, I assumed that the person was a height h above the infinitely dense disk, this would represent half the thickness of a more realistic disk of finite thickness. To get an estimate of the downwards force for a person standing on the disk, I integrated the force for a radius 'd=kh' around the person. This component will provide a pure downward force. It sets a lower bound on the downward force.

<br /> \int_{r=0}^{r=kh} 2\,{\frac {G\rho\,\pi \,r{\it dr}\,h}{ \left({h}^{2}+{r}^{2} \right) ^{3/2}}} <br />

Motivation: the mass of a circle element of radius r is 2 \pi \rho r dr. The distance of the person from this circular mass element is \sqrt{r^2+h^2}. F = G*m / r^2. The downward component gets multiplied by a factor of \frac{h}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}, this factor is 1 when r = 0, and goes towards zero as r increases, it is the sine of the angle if you draw the diagram (opposite side over hypotenuse). The lateral component cancels out.

The value of the integral is

<br /> 2\,{\frac {G\rho\,\pi \, \left( -1+\sqrt {1+{k}^{2}} <br /> \right) }{\sqrt {1+{k}^{2}}}} <br />

The rapidity with which this force approaches a constant value 2 \pi G \rho argues that the ignored components are probably not too significant.

The above is a "good force" from the point of view of someone wanting to stand up and not slide along the disk.

To evaluate the force pulling a person sideways, towards the center of the disk, I ignored the height above the disk and evaluated the integrall

<br /> \int_{r=d}^{r=D}\int_{\theta=-\frac{pi}{2}}^{\frac{pi}{2}} {\frac {G\rho\,{\it dr}\,{\it d \theta}\,\cos \left( \theta \right) }{r} <br />

This is a rather crude approximation, but it sets an upper bounds on the sidewards force. It could probably be improved. It is an integral around a half-circe of radius r>d, r<D. The result is

<br /> 2\,G\rho\,\ln \left( {\it \frac{D}{d}} \right) <br />

The integrals were all done via computer, which makes it both fairly easy to do, and less error-prone - except for setting them up, of course.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K