If we assume:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]E = mc^{2}[/itex]

and for photons:

[itex]E = hv[/itex]

Then we can derive an effective mass:

[itex]m = \frac{hv}{c^{2}}[/itex]

And using simple classical gravity obtain:

[itex]hv - \frac{GMm}{r} = hv - \frac{GMhv}{c^{2}r} = Constant[/itex]

You can derive the constant by evaluating the equation above at the limit as r goes to infinity. This then gives you the gravitational red shift, all without using anything from GR.

So, since this prediction is the same for classical AND GR, how can red shift be used as verification of GR? I'm not questioning GR, just wondering why this is still listed as verification when it's clearly not.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Gravitational Redshift really verification of GR?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Gravitational Redshift really |
---|

I Gravitational DE(?) from Schwartzschild spacetime |

B black hole paradox, gravity waves |

I How does gravitational time dilation work? |

I Maximum Amplitude Of Gravitational Waves |

A Gravitational binding energy and the TOV limit |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**