Gravitational redshift units

  • I
  • Thread starter Zman
  • Start date
  • #1
96
0

Summary:

gravitational redshift units seem to be given as a velocity and not as a ratio
I noticed in physics papers that gravitational redshift is expressed in m/s or km/s.
I assume that this must be the equivalent velocity to produce that same redshift.

So for example, if the gravitational redshift was measured as 3x10 -4 then;

z= v/c

3x10^-4= v/c

v = 9x10^4 m/s

v=90km/s

Is this what they are doing? Why do they prefer velocity over the ratio z?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
25,423
8,612
I noticed in physics papers
Can you give an example?
 
  • #3
96
0
Hi,

This is from Wikipedia which refers to papers and gravitational redshift in km/s;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_redshift

Initial observations of gravitational redshift of white dwarf stars
A number of experimenters initially claimed to have identified the effect using astronomical measurements, and the effect was considered to have been finally identified in the spectral lines of the star Sirius B by W.S. Adams in 1925.[1] However, measurements by Adams have been criticized as being too low[1][2] and these observations are now considered to be measurements of spectra that are unusable because of scattered light from the primary, Sirius A.[2] The first accurate measurement of the gravitational redshift of a white dwarf was done by Popper in 1954, measuring a 21 km/s gravitational redshift of 40 Eridani B.[2]

The redshift of Sirius B was finally measured by Greenstein et al. in 1971, obtaining the value for the gravitational redshift of 89±19 km/s, with more accurate measurements by the Hubble Space Telescope, showing 80.4±4.8 km/s.
 
  • #4
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
25,423
8,612
It looks like they are converting it to the equivalent Doppler shift.
 
  • #5
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
31,241
10,126
Moderator's note: Thread moved to relativity forum.
 
  • #6
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
31,241
10,126
I assume that this must be the equivalent velocity to produce that same redshift.
Yes, as @Vanadium 50 says, they are giving the recession velocity that would produce a Doppler redshift the same as the observed gravitational redshift.

I don't think there's any deep reason for this; it was simply that cosmologists, who were the target audience of the papers mentioned in the Wikipedia article, were used to giving redshifts in velocity units because that is how they are typically thought of in cosmology--not so much because of the ordinary Doppler shift in flat spacetime, but because cosmologists are used to thinking of redshifts due to the expansion of the universe and interpreting them as recession velocities.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Related Threads on Gravitational redshift units

  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
70
Views
11K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
7
Views
595
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
875
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Top