Question about the GR gravitational redshift experiment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational redshift predicted by General Relativity (GR) and its experimental verification through the Pound-Snider experiment. Participants explore how gravitational effects influence the frequency of photons and the implications for measurements of time and light speed in varying gravitational potentials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that GR predicts a photon loses energy and is redshifted when climbing in a gravitational field, referencing the Pound-Snider experiment.
  • Another participant questions how frequency can change due to gravitation, suggesting that if a sender transmits a large number of waves over a month, the receiver should receive the same number without loss.
  • A participant asserts that the frequency of the photon isn't actually changed, but rather the local time rate changes between different gravitational potentials, affecting the perceived frequency.
  • One participant challenges the idea that time rate changes due to gravitation, proposing that various types of clocks show bidirectional variation with gravitational changes and suggesting that light velocity should increase from higher to lower gravitational potential.
  • Another participant elaborates that both the time rate and the size of a ruler vary with gravitational potential, indicating that the coordinate speed of light changes as well, and presents a mathematical relationship involving the Newtonian potential.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the frequency of photons changes due to gravitational effects and the implications for light speed. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the gravitational influence on time rates and light velocity.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various types of clocks and their responses to gravitational changes, indicating a complex interplay of factors that may not be fully resolved in the discussion.

cang.ye1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
GR predict that a photon climbing in the Earth's gravitational field will lose energy and will consequently be redshifted.

A test was done by Pound and Snider in 1965 using the Mossbauer effect
They measured the redshift experienced by a 14.4 Kev rays from the decay of Fe in climbing up a 20 m tower by determining the speed at which a detector at the top must be moved in order to maximize the detection rate i.e. the velocity blueshift balances the gravitational redshift.

My question is: how the frequency can be changed by gravitation?
Suppose sender was turned on for 1 month, it send N(very very huge number) waves, how many waves the receiver should receive? It's definitely N. No wave is lost or created in the 22.6 meter long road.
The sender keeps sending for 1 month, how long the receiver takes to receive the N waves? it's 1 month exactly.

Frequency v = N / T, how the receiver can get a different frequency? redshift or blueshift?

If gama ray device is not good for 1 month non-stop sending, we can use a short wave radio. It's the same but easier to think and understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cang.ye1 said:
GR predict that a photon climbing in the Earth's gravitational field will lose energy and will consequently be redshifted.

A test was done by Pound and Snider in 1965 using the Mossbauer effect
They measured the redshift experienced by a 14.4 Kev rays from the decay of Fe in climbing up a 20 m tower by determining the speed at which a detector at the top must be moved in order to maximize the detection rate i.e. the velocity blueshift balances the gravitational redshift.

My question is: how the frequency can be changed by gravitation?
Suppose sender was turned on for 1 month, it send N(very very huge number) waves, how many waves the receiver should receive? It's definitely N. No wave is lost or created in the 22.6 meter long road.
The sender keeps sending for 1 month, how long the receiver takes to receive the N waves? it's 1 month exactly.

Frequency v = N / T, how the receiver can get a different frequency? redshift or blueshift?

If gama ray device is not good for 1 month non-stop sending, we can use a short wave radio. It's the same but easier to think and understand.

The frequency of the photon isn't actually changed. The local time rate changes between the bottom and the top, so when a photon created at a different potential is compared with a similar resonance at the local location, it appears to have changed in comparison.
 
Jonathan Scott said:
The frequency of the photon isn't actually changed. The local time rate changes between the bottom and the top, so when a photon created at a different potential is compared with a similar resonance at the local location, it appears to have changed in comparison.


I don't think the time rate is changed by gravitation.
There are many kinds of clocks, atomic, gravitational, mechanical, chemical, or even biological. Their time rate varies to bi-direction with gravitation change.

The test should proved light velocity change.
That is, from up to bottom, the light velocity gets higher.
Frequency v keep constant, wave length becomes longer, the speed get higher.
 
cang.ye1 said:
I don't think the time rate is changed by gravitation.
There are many kinds of clocks, atomic, gravitational, mechanical, chemical, or even biological. Their time rate varies to bi-direction with gravitation change.

The test should proved light velocity change.
That is, from up to bottom, the light velocity gets higher.
Frequency v keep constant, wave length becomes longer, the speed get higher.

The relative time rate of a standard clock and any other local process is definitely changed by gravitational potential, which is what this experiment illustrates. However, this is not the only change.

If you try to create a flat coordinate system which covers both locations, then both the time rate and the size of a ruler vary with gravitational potential, and the coordinate speed of light varies with both, so it varies twice as much. In an isotropic coordinate system (one in which the scale factor between local and coordinate space is the same in all directions) the speed of light is approximately proportional to 1 + 2\phi/c^2 where \phi is the Newtonian potential, typically given by -\,Gm/rc^2, so light apparently speeds up as it rises within a potential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K