Gravity conservation / gravitational forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Gravitational forces are classified as conservative forces because they conserve total mechanical energy, meaning the work done by gravity is independent of the path taken. This is mathematically defined as a force that can be expressed as the gradient of a potential function. In contrast, non-conservative forces, such as friction, convert kinetic energy into heat and require more work based on the path length. The discussion highlights that the work done by gravity remains constant regardless of the trajectory, as long as the initial and final heights are the same.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservative and non-conservative forces
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts
  • Basic knowledge of vector fields and gradients
  • Mathematical proficiency in calculus, specifically integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical properties of conservative forces in physics
  • Explore the concept of potential energy in gravitational fields
  • Learn about the implications of non-conservative forces like friction
  • Investigate vector calculus, focusing on gradients and curl
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining mechanics, and anyone interested in the principles of energy conservation in gravitational systems.

Jadaav
Messages
175
Reaction score
1
Why are gravitational forces said to be conservative ?

What does conservative mean here ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's the mathy definition: A conservative force is one that can be expressed as the gradient of a potential function. If that's over your head, a conservative force is a force that conserves (does not change) total mechanical energy (kinetic energy plus potential energy).

It might help to look at forces that aren't conservative. Friction is the canonical example of a non-conservative force. Instead of converting kinetic energy into potential energy (or vice versa), friction converts kinetic energy into heat.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Conservative forces are forces for which the work done moving a particle under the effect of the said force (\int \textbf{F}\cdot \textrm{d}\textbf{r}) is path-independent.

Example: Say a (reasonably point-like) object is lifted from a desk. When looking at the work done, it doesn't matter how much it's moved horizontally, as gravity is a conservative force: The work done is solely determined by the height of the surface and the height of the point the object ends up at. This is not true for all forces. Moving the same object along a surface with friction, like the surface of the said desk, requires more work the longer the path is.

(A vector field \textbf{F} is in fact conservative if any of the following, equivalent conditions are fulfilled: \nabla \times \textbf{F}=0, \exists V s.t. \textbf{F}=-\nabla V (the existence of a potential), \oint \mathbf{F}\cdot \textrm{d}\textbf{r}=0)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Jadaav said:
Why are gravitational forces said to be conservative ?
Say you have a ball and you want to move it from height ##A## to height ##B##. Just for fun, you take a crazy zig-zag path to get from ##A## to ##B## (pretend you just had tons of coffee and are insanely hyperactive xD). Will the work done by gravity during this process be the same or different than the work done by gravity if you simply moved the ball in a straight line down from ##A## to ##B##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks a lot D H, DeIdeal and WannabeNewton :)

It's clear to me now.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
830
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K