Gravity-Defying Bicycle Stunt: How Far is Too Far?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MrSpudmuffin1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bicycle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of a bicycle stunt where a rider attempts to grab a bar while in motion, aiming to complete a rotational arc similar to a gymnast. Participants explore the necessary speed and forces involved, including the calculations for momentum and g-forces experienced during the stunt.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where a child on a bicycle grabs a bar and attempts to rotate around it, questioning the speed and g-forces required for success.
  • Another participant suggests that the problem is solvable and emphasizes the importance of energy conservation in the stunt, proposing techniques to improve the chances of completing the arc.
  • A third participant simplifies the problem to a pendulum model, indicating that achieving a g-force of 5g may be necessary, which could be challenging for most individuals.
  • Further contributions discuss the conservation of energy, proposing equations to relate potential and kinetic energy, while also addressing the impact of arm length on the required speed.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the variables in the equations, including mass, height, and the interpretation of g-force in the context of the stunt.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of confidence in the feasibility of the stunt, with some suggesting it is possible under certain conditions while others highlight the significant challenges involved. There is no consensus on the exact calculations or the practicality of the stunt.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their models, such as the simplifications made in assuming a rigid pendulum and the need for adjustments based on the rider's actual body dynamics and bike mechanics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring the physics of motion, energy conservation, and biomechanics, particularly in the context of stunts and athletic performance.

MrSpudmuffin1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If you were riding a bike and then reached out to grab a bar over your head,
Picture the following senerio... a 50 lb kid is riding a bicycle as fast as he can toward a cloths line. Just at the moment he travels under the bar, he reaches up and grabs the bar and let's the bike go flying off. His hope is to make a complete arch around the bar in the same way a gymnast does when flipping around the bar. The question is, how fast would he have to go to have that amount of momentum to get around the bar and what would the g forces be, so he would know how strong his grip would have to be? If anyone knows how to calculate this could they show how it is calculated?

Thanks, ps not that I'm planning on trying this, I just did try it as a kid and found out it was impossible, but was curious just HOW impossible it really was.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's only impossible if you are weak/fat.

This is an easy problem, in order to do a complete arch you have to have enough energy for your CG to get over the top of the bar, minus the friction losses through your hands.

Give it a try, set up some mats on the floor though. Hint: Curl up into a ball soon after you grab the bar and "pull" on the bar with your arms to get closer to it. You'll make it all the way around, just don't lose grip.
 


You can reduce this to the simplest model in which your mass is in one place and you replace your arms by a piece of rope (i.e. you are a pendulum with a rigid strut). Now assume that you are cycling fast enough to take your centre of mass to the same height above as you were below the bar.
The sums tell you that, if you have enough speed when you launch yourself at the bar, the g force ( or weight force on your arms), irrespective of the length of your arms (believe me- the sums are very easy) will correspond to 5g (including the g that you started with).
With techniques such as the one suggested above you could reduct this value quite a bit but it does show that you could potentially be trying to do the impossible - as you suggest. Not many people could hold five times their dead weight by hanging on with their hands.
Gymnasts who do this are all very muscular, fairly light and have done a lot of practice.
 


Thanks for your suggestions. It does seem pretty hard though to convert the forward force into a rotational momentum around the bar. But I love the idea of curling the body up at the point of impact, that makes great sense.
 


Thanks for your reply Sophiecentuar,

How would you set up the equation to calculate this?

thanks again.
 


Potential Energy at the top has to equal the kinetic energy at the bottom (energy is conserved).

KE = PE
Half m vsquared = m g h

Cancel the m's
then v = Sqrt(gh)

This is reducing it to the very simplest model. By shortening your arms on the way up, you reduce the height you need to reach so you could go slower than this. etc. etc.
 


thanks again Sophicentaur,

So this equation has
m = mass
h = length of my arm to the center of gravity
v = velocity I would have to ride to get over the bar

Is g = to g force? Is the g going to be 5? I didn't understand the g force as 5 as you mentioned in your first response.

so if I used real #s would this look like this:

velocity needed to get over the bar = the square root of 5(76.2cm length of arm) = 19.52 (what are the units on this answer?)

Is this any where near correct?

Thanks sophiecentaur.
 


First, I left out the factor of 1/2 in my rearranging the equation. Sorry- left that as an exercise got the student!
g is 9.81in SI
UNITS.
My 5g is the acceleration that you will experience as you start your curved path when you first grab the bar. (as in 'pulling 5g')
Btw h is the total height you reach at the top of your swing. That will be twice the length of the string. Only related to your arm length if your c.m. is at your shoulders! I said this is for the simplest model of a mass on a string. The lengths etc need modifying for a real body on bike. But it does give you an idea of what happens.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K