Gravity Probe B / precession question

  • Thread starter elegysix
  • Start date
  • #1
406
15
I've been reading up on gravity probe B and the results, but I have a question about precession in general - I've heard it said that since the gyroscopes are in free fall there is no classical precession to be expected.

So then, what explanation was there for earth's precession before general relativity? We knew about earth's precession long before einstein was around. Surely there was a classical model for earth's precession, right? That seems like a big hole in newton's theory if we knew about the earth's precession but couldn't explain it.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
9,908
1,089
In Newtonian theory, the Earth precesses because it's not perfectly spherical - i.e because it has an equatorial bulge. Goldstein, "Classical Mechanics", has quite a bit about it. Tidal forces won't cause a perfect sphere to precess, but they will cause an imperfect one to precess.

I'm pretty sure that this is the dominant cause of precession even in GR (though I'm not positive on this point).

Great care was taken to make the gravity probe gyroscopes almost perfectly spherical, so that this effect wouldn't interfere with the experiment.
 
  • #3
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,076
787
I may be wrong, but I think precession of earth is due to the earth being not spherical but oblate, so there are forces which try to move the equator back to the eclipsis and which are responsible for the precession. In GP-B this mechanism should be absent, as the rotators are almost perfectly spherical.
 

Related Threads on Gravity Probe B / precession question

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Top