Gravity vs Inertia: Einstein's Simple Experiment Explained

  • Thread starter Reuben Smith
  • Start date
In summary, Einstein proposed that there is no way to distinguish between a gravitational field and an equivalent uniform acceleration in a small volume of space. He also stated that the curvature of light would be different in a gravitational field compared to an inertial field due to the curvature of the Earth. This can be observed by filling two elevators with water and shining a beam of light horizontally. The elevator in the gravitational field would have deeper water in the center due to the stronger force of gravity, while the elevator in the inertial field would have the same depth throughout. This is known as the tidal effect and is only present in a field due to pure acceleration.
  • #1
Reuben Smith
9
0
Einstein stated that “there is no experiment that a person can conduct in a small volume of space that would distinguish a gravitational field and an equivalent uniform acceleration”.
He proposed that if you had two elevators, one on the Earth and the other far out in space away from any gravitational body and it was accelerating at 9.8 meters per second per second that there would be no way to tell if you were in the one in space or the one on earth.
Now he also stated that if someone who is outside each of these imaginary elevators shines a beam of light through the window of the elevator that is accelerating the person shining the light will see the beam traveling in a horizontal path, while the person in the elevator will perceive the beam of light as having a curved path.
Now according to his equivalence theory which is the backbone of his general theory of relativity, a person in the elevator on Earth will perceive a beam of light shone through the window of his elevator as following a curved path.
Now if he allows for one to observe close enough perceive this curve in the light beam, I will propose an experiment that will differentiate gravity from an inertia field due to acceleration of gravity in a small closed space.
If you were to fill these elevators with enough water to cover the floors and shine a beam of light from the center of each of these two elevators outward horizontally the beam of light would be closer to the water at the edge of the elevator in the inertial field than the one in the gravitational field of the earth, because the water in the gravitational field will have a curvature equal to the curvature of the earth. The reason for this curvature is that the force of gravity between two objects varies inversely with the square of the distance as shown by the formula and gravity works as we know works idepentaly on each atom. . The reason we know that gravity works indepenantly on each atom is the fact that a feather will fall at the same rate as a lead ball in a vacuum


. This simply means that gravitational force decreases with distance.
Therefore if the floors in these two elevators were perfect planes and did not have the same curvature of the earth, the center of the elevator in the gravity field of Earth would be closer to the Earth than the outside edges, therefore the water would be deeper in the middle where the force of gravity is stronger, because the water would have the same curvature as the Earth and the floor being a perfect plane would not follow the curvature of the earth.
While the water in the inertial field would be at the same depth at the center as it is at the edges.
This is the tidal effect and it would not be present in a field due to pure acceleration
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Reuben Smith said:
If you were to fill these elevators with enough water to cover the floors and shine a beam of light from the center of each of these two elevators outward horizontally the beam of light would be closer to the water at the edge of the elevator in the inertial field than the one in the gravitational field of the earth, because the water in the gravitational field will have a curvature equal to the curvature of the earth. The reason for this curvature is that the force of gravity between two objects varies inversely with the square of the distance as shown by the formula and gravity works as we know works idepentaly on each atom.
As you say later in your post, this curvature is a "tidal effect", and it's understood that the equivalence principle is only supposed to work in the limit as the size of the elevator (and the time interval in which you are making your measurements) becomes small enough that tidal effects also become arbitrarily small (too small to measure by whatever instruments you're using, say). See the discussion of this in the last section of this article about the equivalence principle.
 

FAQ: Gravity vs Inertia: Einstein's Simple Experiment Explained

What is the difference between gravity and inertia?

Gravity is a force that pulls objects towards each other, while inertia is an object's resistance to changes in its state of motion. In other words, gravity is an external force acting on an object, while inertia is an intrinsic property of an object.

How did Einstein's simple experiment demonstrate the relationship between gravity and inertia?

Einstein's simple experiment involved dropping a feather and a hammer at the same time on the moon, where there is no atmosphere to affect their fall. Both objects hit the ground at the same time, demonstrating that they were affected by the same force of gravity, regardless of their difference in mass. This showed that gravity affects all objects in the same way, regardless of their mass or weight.

Can inertia and gravity cancel each other out?

No, inertia and gravity cannot cancel each other out. Inertia is an intrinsic property of an object and cannot be canceled out, while gravity is a force that always exists between two objects with mass. However, inertia can balance out the effects of gravity, as seen in Einstein's experiment with the feather and hammer.

How does the concept of relativity relate to gravity and inertia?

Einstein's theory of relativity states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This means that the effects of gravity and inertia are relative and depend on the observer's frame of reference. For example, an object's inertia may appear greater to an observer in a moving reference frame compared to an observer in a stationary frame.

Are gravity and inertia the only forces affecting objects in motion?

No, there are other forces that can affect objects in motion, such as friction, air resistance, and electromagnetic forces. However, gravity and inertia are fundamental forces that play a significant role in the motion of objects in our universe.

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top