Gravity what holds us on the earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter b.j.c
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Gravity
AI Thread Summary
Gravity exerts a force of approximately 688N on a 70kg person, which is significantly stronger than the calculated centripetal force needed to keep that person in orbit at the Earth's surface speed of 1669 km/hr. The initial confusion stemmed from an incorrect centripetal force calculation, which was later corrected to only 2.4N. This discrepancy clarifies that gravity is more than sufficient to keep individuals grounded. The excess gravitational force accounts for the downward acceleration experienced when jumping or falling. Understanding these forces helps explain why we remain on the Earth's surface despite its rotation.
b.j.c
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is probably a stupid question, but anyway...

If you calculate the force of gravity between the Earth and a, say, 70.0kg person, it comes out about 688N.

Now, we are spinning with the Earth and at the surface of the equator the speed is about 1669km/hr. If you calculate the centripetal force required to keep a 70.0kg person rotating in a fixed orbit (radius of earth) at 1669km/hr you will find it comes out around 3e7N.

So it would seem that we should just go flying off the planet because gravity cannot supply the centripetal force required to keep us orbiting with the same radius. How do we stay on the ground then? What have I missed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your centripetal force is wrong. The force required on a 70 kg person is only 2.4 N. Gravity supplies 688 N, which is more than enough to keep the person on the ground.
 
Thanks James, a very dumb mistake.

So the 'leftover' force goes into accelerating us toward the Earth if we jump or something?
 
Yes. The leftover force is what pulls you down again when you jump up, or fall off something high.
 
Cool, thanks.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top