B GRB vs Death Star: Could Gamma Rays Destroy Planets?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Petka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Death Star
AI Thread Summary
Gamma ray bursts (GRBs) emit immense energy, potentially capable of affecting planets within a certain range. While they can destroy atmospheres from light years away, the energy required to completely disintegrate a planet is significant and depends on its distance from the GRB. A naive application of the inverse square law indicates that planets more than 820 AU away would not receive enough energy for disintegration, with closer, heavier planets like Jupiter being more vulnerable. However, the narrow beam of energy emitted by GRBs typically misses most planets due to their alignment with the stellar rotation axis. Overall, while GRBs can cause severe damage, the likelihood of complete planetary destruction is low under typical circumstances.
Daniel Petka
Messages
147
Reaction score
16
A gamma ray burst radiates an enormous amount of energy.
Could it blow up planets like, let's say a Death Star can if they were close enough? I can imagine that, since grbs are able do destroy an atmosphere while being light years away.
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
Physics news on Phys.org
An Earth-like atmosphere has a negligible mass compared to a planet, and "messing up the chemistry" is different from "completely removing the atmosphere".

GRB emit something like 1044 J in a cone of a few degrees width, something like 1/3000 of the full solid angle. Values from here. Inside the cone, the intensity corresponds to an isotropic emission of 3*1047 J.

Earth has a gravitational binding energy of 2*1032 J.

A naive application of the inverse square law shows the planet doesn't receive enough energy to be disintegrated if it is more than 820 AU away. This value is much smaller for heavier planets (90 AU for Jupiter) and larger for smaller planets.

A planet in the system of the exploding star could receive enough energy. There are two caveats, however:
- the energy is emitted in a narrow beam aligned with the stellar rotation axis. In most systems, this is outside the plane where the planets orbit. The intense main beam will miss the planets.
- The assumption that all the energy hitting the planet goes into disassembling it is unrealistic. You would get a scenario like the last one here, where you quickly get a plasma layer and then most energy is absorbed by a surface layer of plasma.
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
Thanks
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top