Great new Google version (for research)

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Google Research
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
http://scholar.google.com/


this is the beta version
it searches the scholarly journal literature
and finds free online versions of articles (if you don't have a
subscription to the journals

I read that it even ranks its hits by the citation indices
(how highly an article is regarded by other scientists can
be estimated at least roughly by how often other articles
cite it as reference)

thanks to "uncle Al" for this bit of news

I expect this new "scientist version" of
Google will be helpful

Here is something in Nature journal about it
http://www.nature.com/news/2004/041115/full/041115-13.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amazing

Halve an hour googling gets more knowledge in than an afternoon in a library. That's now 5 minutes with this toy.

Thanks Marcus.

Cool
 
Andre said:
Amazing

Halve an hour googling gets more knowledge in than an afternoon in a library. That's now 5 minutes with this toy.

Thanks Marcus.

Cool

Maybe you should google up yourself a dictionary. :smile:

I kid.
 
Google ranks its hits by the number of citations. So it is a great introduction to the fundations of any topic. However, the most recent work on the topic is lost. The best way to get the most recent work is still to search in www.arXiv.org, which will organize hits from most recent to earliest, of only papers in the arXiv of course.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top