Griffiths Introduction to Quantum Physics 2.13.B

  • Thread starter deltafee
  • Start date
  • #1
10
0

Homework Statement


construct ψ(x,t)^(2) where ψ(x,t) = 1/5(3ψ_0(x)e^(-iE_0t/ħ)+4ψ_1(x)e^(-iE_1t/ħ). I know we square it but we have to find E_0 and E_1 and put it in.

Homework Equations


E_n = (ħ^(2)k_n^(2))/2m = (n^(2)π^(2)ħ^(2))/2ma^(2)

The Attempt at a Solution


E_0 = 0 and E_(1) = (1π^(2)ħ^(2))/2ma^(2)
Proper solution: E_0 = ħω/2 and E_1 = 3ħω/2
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
17,389
7,279
You have said nothing of the potential that is assumed for the given problem. This is necessary information as it will affect the energy eigenvalues and eigenstates.
 
  • #3
10
0
The full problem is:
A particle in the harmonic oscillator potential starts out in the state Ψ(x,0) = A[3ψ_0(x)+4ψ_1(x)]
A. = Find A, A = 1/5
B. Construct Ψ(x,t) and |Ψ(x,t)|^2:
Ψ(x,t) = 1/5[3ψ(x)e^(-((iE_0 t)/ħ)+4ψ(x)e^(-(iE_1 t)/ħ)]

What I understand is that the the harmonic states is 0 and 1 so n = 0 and n = 1
 
  • #4
10
0
However, I just found the equation
E_(n) = (n+1/2)ħω

so it makes sense now, however, I have a question about part C. which is find <x> and <p>.
so x = (ħ/(2mω))^(½)(a_(+)-a_(-)) and <x> = (1/25)(ħ/(2mω))^(½)(∫Ψ^*(a_+a_-)Ψdx but I am alittle confused on what to do next.
I believe what happens is a_+3ψ_0 + a_4ψ_1 = 3ψ_(n+1)^(2)e^(-iωt)+4ψ_(n-1)^(2)e^(iωt)= 3(4ψ_1^(2))e^(-iωt)+4(3ψ_(0)^2)e^(iωt) is this the correct understanding?
 
  • #5
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,224
1,827
however, I have a question about part C. which is find <x> and <p>.
so x = (ħ/(2mω))^(½)(a_(+)-a_(-)) and <x> = (1/25)(ħ/(2mω))^(½)(∫Ψ^*(a_+a_-)Ψdx but I am alittle confused on what to do next.
I believe what happens is a_+3ψ_0 + a_4ψ_1 = 3ψ_(n+1)^(2)e^(-iωt)+4ψ_(n-1)^(2)e^(iωt)= 3(4ψ_1^(2))e^(-iωt)+4(3ψ_(0)^2)e^(iωt) is this the correct understanding?
Your post is really hard to read. Please take a few minutes to learn LaTeX.

It's pretty clear the two sides around the first equal sign aren't, in fact, equal. You're not doing yourself any favors being sloppy with the math. Clean up your notation.
 
  • #6
10
0
In part C. I need to find $$\left<x\right>$$ and $$\left<p\right>$$ using Ladder Operators:
$$\Psi\left(x,t\right) = \frac{1}{5}\left(3\psi_{0}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{i\omega t}{2}}+4\psi_{1}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}\right)$$
$$x = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\left(a_{+}+a_{-}\right)$$
So:
$$\left<x\right> = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\int \Psi^{*}\left(a_{+}+a_{-}\right)\Psi_{n} (Eq1)$$, I know that the next step in the solution is $$\left<x\right>=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\int\left(12\psi_{0}^{2}e^{-i\omega t}+12\psi_{1}^{2}e^{i\omega t}\right)dx(Eq2)$$ and I am confused on how you get from Eq1 to Eq2. My idea of the step in between is
$$\left<x\right>=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\int \left(3a_{+}\psi_{0} +4a_{-}\psi_{1}\right)$$
 
  • #7
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,224
1,827
The usual distributive rules apply here. Multiply everything out as you usually would to calculate ##(a_+ + a_-)(c_1 \psi_0 + c_2\psi_1)##.
 
  • #8
10
0
from that distribution we get $$ \left(3a_{+}\psi_{0}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{i\omega t}{2}}+4a_{-}\psi_{1}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}+3a_{-}\psi_{0}e^{-\frac{i\omega t}{2}}+4a_{-}\psi\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}\right)$$
and
$$a_{+}=\sqrt{n+1}\psi_{n+1}, a_{-}=\sqrt{n}\psi_{n-1}$$
and using that operate you get:
$$ 3\sqrt{n+1}\psi_{1}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{i\omega t}{2}}+4\sqrt{n+1}\psi_{2}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}+3\sqrt{n}\psi_{-1}e^{-\frac{i\omega t}{2}}+4\sqrt{n}\psi_{0}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}$$
which is
$$ 3\sqrt{0+1}\psi_{1}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{i\omega t}{2}}+4\sqrt{1+1}\psi_{2}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}+3\sqrt{0}\psi_{-1}e^{-\frac{i\omega t}{2}}+4\sqrt{1}\psi_{0}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}$$
So you get:
$$ 3\psi_{1}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{i\omega t}{2}}+4\sqrt{2}\psi_{2}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}+4\psi_{0}\left(x\right)e^{-\frac{3i\omega t}{2}}$$
Then multiplying by $$\Psi^{*}$$ we get:
$$9\psi_{0}\psi_{1}+12\sqrt{2}\psi_{2}\psi_{0}e^{-i\omega t}+12\psi_{0}^{2}e^{-1i\omega t}+12\psi_{1}^{2}e^{i\omega t}+16\sqrt{2}\psi_{2}\psi_{1}+16\psi_{0}\psi_{2}$$
and since $$\psi_{0}$$, $$\psi_{2}$$ and $$\psi_{1}$$ are all orthogonal to each other we get:
$$12\psi_{0}^{2}e^{-i\omega t}+12\psi_{1}^{2}e^{i\omega t}$$
Is that the correct process of thinking, I get the solution but I just want to make sure I got the right methodology.
 

Related Threads on Griffiths Introduction to Quantum Physics 2.13.B

Replies
9
Views
999
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
19K
Top