Ground State Energy for infinte potential well

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle of mass (m) in a one-dimensional infinite potential well, with a specific wave function provided. The goal is to determine the potential energy V0 using the Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses confusion regarding the time-dependent nature of the wave function and questions whether to separate variables to solve for energy. They seek clarification on the appropriate approach to take.
  • Some participants highlight the distinction between the time-dependent and time-independent Schrödinger equations, suggesting that the time behavior of the wave function can be deduced from the energy without solving the full equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some providing insights into the relationship between time-dependent and time-independent equations. The original poster is attempting to apply the guidance received and is exploring the problem further.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics, particularly the implications of eigenstates and boundary conditions in the context of the infinite potential well.

Ryomega
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass (m) moves in the one-dimensional potential

V(x) = V0 0 ≤ x ≤ a
= ∞ otherwise

Wave function of the particle is ψ(x,t) = C sin ([itex]\frac{x\pi}{a}[/itex]exp[-iωt]
Determine V0

Homework Equations



Schrödinger's Equations

Time-independent

Hψ(x) + V(x)ψ=i[itex]\hbar[/itex][itex]\frac{\partialψ}{\partial t}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I got extremely confused because usually when I run into these questions, the wave function is not a function of time.

So I don't actually know "how" to solve this equation. Do I separate the variables in the wave function and try to solve for E?

Do I use the time-dependent equation? If so how do I solve for E.

No need to show the math, but please take me through every step.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh and if someone can point me towards a video/website showing how to separate the variables in the wave function if I need to do so.
 
This is an important concept to get your head around: the difference between the time-dependent and the time-independent Schrödinger Equation. The key insight here is that since you're dealing with eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, their time behavior is very simple.

Specifically, since [itex]i\frac{d}{dt}\psi(x,t) = \hat{H}\psi(x,t)[/itex], and [itex]\hat{H}\psi(x,t) = E\psi(x,t)[/itex], we have [itex]i\frac{d}{dt}\psi(x, t) = E\psi(x, t)[/itex]. That means that the time derivative of the wave function is a constant--it depends neither on time nor position. Therefore, the phase of the wavefunction just oscillates at a constant rate, which is proportional to the energy. So if the wavefunction at [itex]t=0[/itex] is [itex]\psi_0(x)[/itex], the wavefunction at other times is [itex]\psi(x, t) = e^{-iEt}\psi_0(x)[/itex].

Since we know the time behavior of the wavefunction can be easily deduced simply by finding the energy, there's really no point in solving the full differential equation with time and space. It's enough to simply solve the spatial equation [itex]\psi_0(x)[/itex] only, and then we can reconstruct the full equation off of that. In this case, you should be able to use the boundary conditions plus the time-independent SE to solve for [itex]\psi_0(x)[/itex], and then you should be able to find the energy [itex]E[/itex] off of that.
 
Thanks for the quick reply. I'll try it out and see if I run into problems. I'm still trying to get my head around what you said.

Thanks again!
 
It worked out fine, and I "think" (very sure I do) I understand the concept.

Thank you so much for your help!
 
If Iv got this right, your saying that ψ0(x) = C sin (xπ/a)exp[it(E-ω)]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K