Grounding wire in household circuitry?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity and implications of grounding in household electrical circuits. Participants explore various aspects of grounding, including safety concerns, the role of grounding in preventing electrical shocks, and the impact of grounding on equipment protection, particularly in the context of older installations and modern photovoltaic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of grounding household circuits, suggesting that if transformers were ungrounded, touching the housing would not result in a shock unless both wires were touched.
  • Another participant counters that older devices might have resistive connections to Earth, which could create dangerous situations even if the transformer is ungrounded.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for lightning strikes to damage equipment if grounding is not present, as grounding helps maintain a consistent potential.
  • Discussion includes the challenges of detecting ground faults, especially with the introduction of large photovoltaic systems, where grounding the neutral wire may complicate fault detection.
  • Some participants note that modern residual current devices (RCDs) can detect unbalanced currents without needing a ground reference, but emphasize that safety systems are necessary due to the unpredictability of electrical faults.
  • There is mention of the cost and complexity of using isolated wiring systems, which may require more advanced detection mechanisms to ensure safety.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and effectiveness of grounding in household circuitry. While some acknowledge the protective benefits of grounding, others raise concerns about its implications and the potential for safety issues in ungrounded systems. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in grounding systems, including the potential for undetected faults and the challenges posed by older installations. The discussion also touches on the need for advanced safety measures in isolated systems, indicating that assumptions about the reliability and cost-effectiveness of such systems may not hold true in practice.

  • #31
the_emi_guy said:
No, I believe you are wrong here.

The OP is correct in asserting that if the two wires supplying electricity to your house were completely isolated from ground, you would need to touch both of them to get shocked.

If you touch one side of a battery to the Earth, will it drain the battery?

The topic of this thread is the practicality and tradeoffs of maintaining this isolation.
Appliances are connected one way or another to ground whether intentional or not. It may be by sitting on ground making Ohmic contact, or it may be capacitive - but a floating power system would have enough imbalance to ground to present a potentially lethal hazard to anyone making ground contact to either hot side of the floating source.

The idea of a perfectly floating source is science fiction.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ahh, yes. I see your point, Jim. You are correct. But keeping the system isolated is the problem. The idea, here, is to assume that the worst could happen. If a tree were to make contact with with the transmission lines, or any other form of ground fault should occurr, the system would not fail safe. It would then be grounded waiting for you to make the circuit complete (again referring to the loose wire touching the housing of the wash machine). If the housing were also grounded, you couldn't complete the circuit.
 
  • #33
gt 5 said:
You, being of higher resistance are, then, not the path of least resistance.
I have to point out that "least resistance" doesn't mean 'all the current'. The current is shared between the Earth path and the person holding the faulty equipment. There will be a finite but small current through the body (often detectable as a mild tingle). The presence of the Earth conductor means that the two parallel paths present a very low resistance so the voltage drop to Earth will be safely low.
Kirchoff 1 always applies and the naive statement that "current takes the easiest path" is not to an appropriate standard for PF discussions. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #34
Maybe this will help cement the concept:
rude man said:
but a floating power system would have enough imbalance to ground to present a potentially lethal hazard to anyone making ground contact to either hot side of the floating source.

The idea of a perfectly floating source is science fiction.

it's a matter of scale. Large system yes; small system, well, maybe.
When a system gets large enough that its surface area creates capacitance sufficient to pass a good part of an amp, maybe 1/50th, it can deliver a painful shock through that capacitance as rude man stated.

That capacitance has some impedance at line frequency.
In industrial systems it is recommended(IEEE142) that the grounding impedance be a smaller number of resistive ohms, so that Q remains low.
In residential systems that number is zero.

Everything powered by one of these

sshot4da266d2581a8.jpg


is powered from a "floating" supply. The system may or may not be earthed. The laptop I'm typing this on is not.
wall_wart_typical.jpg


There is minute capacitance between primary and secondary windings, as mentioned.
That's minimized by split-bobbin winding, which also assures that an insulation failure won't let their two wires touch.

splitbobbin.jpg

Here is a little transformer using a divided (or split) bobbin. This is very practical, because it completely separates the primary from the secondary winding, making it much easier to achieve the degree of insulation required for safety.
http://ludens.cl/Electron/trafos/trafos.html

What's important for beginners to grasp is that "electricity" has no magical affinity for "ground", current only goes there in obedience of Kirchoff's laws.
Ground is simply another wire that happens to go most everyplace. We have this discussion a lot here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JakeBrodskyPE and the_emi_guy
  • #36
gt 5 said:
If houwever there is no ground wire, you MAY become the conduit to the Earth and complete the circuit into the Earth's infinite 'sink' or 'supply' of electrons..

I should also point out that the Earth does not have an infinite number of electrons. It may be a large number, but then again the number of electrons in a short piece of wire is also a large number. When dealing with quantitative topics it is usually not good to invoke infinity.

From quick Google search:
Number of electrons in earth: order of 10^50
Number of electrons in 1m long piece of wire: order of 10^23.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K