Group of inner automorphisms is isomorphic to a quotient

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group quotient
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the relationship between a group ##G## and its center ##Z(G)##, specifically exploring the isomorphism between the quotient group ##G / Z(G)## and the group of inner automorphisms ##Inn(G)##. Participants are tasked with establishing a surjective homomorphism and identifying the kernel of this mapping.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of defining a surjective homomorphism from ##G## to ##Inn(G)##, with some suggesting the mapping ##\mu(g) = \varphi_g##, where ##\varphi_g(x) = gxg^{-1}##. Questions arise regarding the kernel of this homomorphism and its relationship to ##Z(G)##.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the properties of the proposed homomorphism, with some participants questioning the completeness of the kernel identification. The discussion reflects a mix of agreement and uncertainty regarding the implications of the kernel and the application of the fundamental homomorphism theorem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the kernel of the homomorphism as it relates to the proof, and there is mention of potential confusion regarding the definitions and implications of the kernel in this context.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Let ##G## be any group. Recall that the center of ##G##, or ##Z(G)## is ##\{ x \in G ~ | ~ xg =
gx, ~ \forall g \in G\}##. Show that ##G / Z(G)## is isomorphic to ##Inn(G)##, the group of inner automorphisms of ##G## by ##g##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure where to get started. I know that I am trying to find a particular isomorphism, but not sure how to find what that isomorphism must be, or whether that map will go from ##G / Z(G)## to ##Inn(G)## or the other way around.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you establish a surjective homomorphism ##G \twoheadrightarrow Inn(G)\;##?
 
fresh_42 said:
Can you establish a surjective homomorphism ##G \twoheadrightarrow Inn(G)\;##?
Define a general element of ##Inn(G)## to be ##\varphi_g(x) = gxg^{-1}##

Would ##\mu : G \rightarrow Inn(G)## where ##\mu (g) = \varphi_g## be a surjection?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Define a general element of ##Inn(G)## to be ##\varphi_g(x) = gxg^{-1}##

Would ##\mu : G \rightarrow Inn(G)## where ##\mu (g) = \varphi_g## be a surjection?
Yes, because every inner automorphism (=conjugation) looks like a ##\mu (g)##, so ##g## is the pre-imange. Now what is the kernel of ##\mu##?
 
fresh_42 said:
Yes, because every inner automorphism (=conjugation) looks like a ##\mu (g)##, so ##g## is the pre-imange. Now what is the kernel of ##\mu##?
Scratch that

##Ker( \mu ) = Z(G)##
 
No. ##\{e\} \subseteq \ker \mu## but not necessarily the entire kernel. The kernel is defined as the set of all elements that maps to ##e'## in the codomain. Now what is this ##e'## then and what does it mean, that ##\mu ## maps an element ##g## on it?
 
fresh_42 said:
No. ##\{e\} \subseteq \ker \mu## but not necessarily the entire kernel. The kernel is defined as the set of all elements that maps to ##e'## in the codomain. Now what is this ##e'## then and what does it mean, that ##\mu ## maps an element ##g## on it?
Sorry, I made a mistake and was too slow to correct. I think that ##Ker (\mu ) = Z(G)##

Will the fundamental homomorphism theorem be used?
 
Not sure what this theorem is, but sounds right. How do you now, that ##\ker \mu = Z(G)\,##? This is the essential part of the proof, so you should drop a line on it.
 
fresh_42 said:
Not sure what this theorem is, but sounds right. How do you now, that ##\ker \mu = Z(G)\,##? This is the essential part of the proof, so you should drop a line on it.
##\ker \mu = \{x \in G ~ | ~ \mu (x) = \mu (e) \} = \{x \in G ~ | ~ \varphi_x = \varphi_e \} = \{x \in G ~ | ~ \varphi_x (g) = \varphi_e (g), ~ \forall g \in G \} = \{x \in G ~ | ~ x g x^{-1} = g, ~ \forall g \in G \} = \{x \in G ~ | ~ xg = gx, ~ \forall g \in G\} = Z(G)##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K