Group Theory: Is A a Left Coset of G?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether a finite subset A of a group G, satisfying the condition |A²|=|A|², is necessarily a left coset of G. The participants confirm that this holds true for groups with two elements and Abelian groups with |A| > 1. However, complications arise for larger sets and non-Abelian groups. Key insights involve proving that xA = A² and analyzing the subgroup K = {g ∈ G | gA = A}, leading to a contradiction that supports the proposition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically left cosets and subgroups.
  • Familiarity with the properties of Abelian and non-Abelian groups.
  • Knowledge of set operations and cardinality in the context of groups.
  • Ability to construct and analyze proofs in abstract algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of left cosets in group theory.
  • Investigate the implications of |A²|=|A|² in various group structures.
  • Learn about subgroup criteria and their applications in proofs.
  • Explore examples of both Abelian and non-Abelian groups to see how these concepts apply.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory and its applications in higher mathematics.

micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,170
Reaction score
3,327
This is not a homework problem. I was just wondering.

Let G be a group and let A be a finite subset of G. If |A²|=|A|² (where A^2=\{a_1a_2~\vert~a_1,a_2\in A\} ). Is it true that A is a left coset of G?

If A has two elements, then I have proven that this is true. But for greater elements, it soon becomes very complicated. I do think this is true...

Anybody got a proof/counterexample or maybe some hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought A would have to be a subgroup rather than just a subset?

whereas a coset is a subset of the group G.
 
It is true for Abelian groups where |A| > 1. Cause

|A2| ≤ Choose(|A|, 2) < |A|2 (so unequal)

So your assumption will always be false so the proposition will always be true.

When the group is not Abelian the key is to look at elements which do not commute (I would say).
 
Last edited:
Uh, no. Take G an abelian group, then |G|²=|G²|. The assumption can certainly be satisfied, even in abelian groups...
 
micromass said:
Uh, no. Take G an abelian group, then |G|²=|G²|.

If G is a group, then G^2 = G, so

|G^2| = |G| &lt; |G|^2

assuming G is nontrivial.
 
Damn... It appears that I have posted the wrong problem. Never mind this thread...
 
Huh the problem statement seems fine. It can be found on page 5 of this http://www.mfo.de/programme/schedule/2010/27/OWR_2010_29.pdf" (under Question: (1)), as my teacher received this problem from the author of that particular paper at a conference in India.

I do think I have a solution, thanks to some comments from my TA, and some good ideas from micromass.

As micromass suggested, the first step is to show xA = A^2, which we can of course write as A = x^{-1} A^2. The key insight is to consider the set K = \{g \in G \,|\, gA = A\}. It is straightforward to show that this is a subgroup of G. Unraveling the definition of K, we see that x^{-1} A \subset K, so |x^{-1} A| \leq |K| . If we can show |x^{-1} A|\geq |K|, we're done. Now |x^{-1} A| = |A| (exhibit a bijection), so it remains to prove |A| \geq |K|. Contradiction seemed to be the easiest route here.

And that's really it.

*EDIT* Obviously I left out a lot of details, mainly to allow those who might have been interested in the problem in the first place to figure out various individual arguments. I'll be happy to clarify any particular part of the proof, and please point out any oversights I might have made.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks snipez. I was really breaking my head at this one :smile: Now I can be at rest...
 
snipez, the problem you are solving is not the one posed in the OP.
 
  • #10
Ah yes, finally I notice the |A| term is squared, but in fact the problem I posted (with the condition |A^2| = |A|) is the one micromass meant to refer to. That thread is somewhere lost in the homework help forums. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
643
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K