Guassian pdf is sum of two other RV Integral evaluation -

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EmmaSaunders1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Pdf Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on transforming the integral of a Gaussian probability density function (pdf) into a specific form using substitution and completing the square. The integral in question is expressed as $exp{-1/2(y-x)^2(A^{-1}) + x^2(B^{-1})}dx$, where y is defined as the sum of two random variables, x and n. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly identifying terms k1, k2, and k3, which are derived from the completed square form of the expression. The final goal is to evaluate the integral to find the posterior distribution of the Gaussian random variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian random variables and their properties
  • Knowledge of completing the square in quadratic expressions
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, particularly Gaussian integrals
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about Gaussian integrals and their applications in probability theory
  • Study the method of completing the square in more detail
  • Explore the derivation of conditional probability distributions for Gaussian random variables
  • Review LaTeX formatting for clearer mathematical communication
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, data scientists, and anyone involved in probabilistic modeling and analysis of Gaussian distributions.

  • #31
Hi I have done the integration - but still don't get the result from the book, the terms inside the exp differ in the book to what I have calculated is there some factorization that I am missing - (also in my previous post the k-term dropped a yvalue which has been put back in - apologies)

Your thoughts are appreciated x
 

Attachments

  • Almost1.GIF
    Almost1.GIF
    10.7 KB · Views: 510
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
This is the denominator of the conditional probability expression, right? Well, it's not exactly right but there is a close resemblance. Now you go back and do it over again half a dozen times, looking for the sign errors.
 
  • #33
Thats right - it's almost the denominator - I was just wondering - is there any methods to simply pull out the A^-1B^-1 from the exponential, some factorizing trick. - also I used the subsitutuion in my integral - u=(2k2)^1/2(x-k3). In a previous post you mentions u=(2k2)^-1/2(x-k3), was this merely due to a mistake I made in my notation, would you be-able to clarify that the substitution I have performed is okay? - Thanks
 
  • #34
Yeah, I probably made a mistake.

I think at this point you've basically got it. You just need to go back over your work, fidn the errors. Also, given that you know where you want to end up, check whether, where your answer and their answer seem to differ, they are just different ways of writing the same thing.
 
  • #35
At last - all I needed was [A^-1B^-1]/[A^-1+B^-1] = [A+B]^-1

Thanks for the help - - this is a great forum
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
772
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K