Guess Who Wrote This? - A PF Game

  • Thread starter Thread starter FZ+
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
A game was proposed where participants guess the author and forum of quotes from posts on a platform, specifically targeting well-known users to avoid obscure references. The initial quote provided was from a user named FZ+, and subsequent guesses led to discussions about refining the rules, including ensuring quotes are original and not sourced from elsewhere. Participants engaged in playful banter while attempting to identify quotes, with notable mentions of users like Iacchus32, eNtRopY, and Hurkyl. The conversation included humorous anecdotes and reflections on past posts, with some users recalling memorable quotes and their contexts. The game fostered a sense of nostalgia and community among participants as they navigated through various quotes and their origins.
  • #61
Could people focus on 1 quote rather than several quotes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
BH: Sounds like Iaachus in Philosophy I think. Barring that, religion.

Right about LG of course. It is obviously from the start of LG's infamous "Proof for the existence of god..."

Maybe we are getting too many philosophy ones?
 
  • #63
FZ,
Yes, it was Iaachus in religion. :smile:
 
  • #64
Originally posted by Tsunami
Nope. It was in How Stuff Works. Here's another of my favorites:

Who said this?

"I once got drunk with some illegal aliens. Then I think I lost my car for about six hours."

I remember this one well. Ivan
Seeking in mystics & pseudo
 
  • #65
Originally posted by zoobyshoe
I remember this one well. Ivan
Seeking in mystics & pseudo

Ya that one was pretty trasparent- I could have easily made the same guess (so why didn't I?..grrrr)
 
  • #66
Uh... is it my go?

"That Crusader was a particular example that made me mention Runsfeld...when ever a raving, slobbering hawk like Rumsfeld sees a problem, it must be HUGE."
 
  • #67
Originally posted by BoulderHead
Here is another big, long, hint;

"As for the number 666, what it represents is two thirds, and hence the second of three degrees: the first being 0 to 333, the second being 334 to 666, and the third being 667 to 1000. Which would be about right, for if you portrayed a symmetrical cross, where the top, bottom, left and right (sections) were equal in length, then by adding "an extension" equal in length at the base, you would have these same three degrees portrayed by the height of the cross: where the first two degrees (666 and below) exist below the horizontal plane, or "cross beam," and the third degree (667 and above) exists above it. So in this respect the number 217 (as opposed to 216) would be similar to 667."

When I read this only one member comes to my mind. How about you?

It reminds me of one of our faviorite crackpots, he's been gone for a long time, Fellow called himself Donde, had his own definition of Pi.
 
  • #68
It reminds me of one of our faviorite crackpots, he's been gone for a long time, Fellow called himself Donde, had his own definition of Pi.
Did he insist that (Pi)(rround), not square?


Originally posted by FZ+
Uh... is it my go?

"That Crusader was a particular example that made me mention Runsfeld...when ever a raving, slobbering hawk like Rumsfeld sees a problem, it must be HUGE."
Was it Njorl?
(the word 'hawk' makes me think of him)
 
  • #69
Nope.
 
  • #70
Fz+

Was it that incendiary Danish guy
who had that long thread going
about how Americans are culturally
inferior?
 
  • #71
Close.. (only many thousands of miles) but no cigar.
 
  • #72
Right thread, wrong poster, I'm
guessing. Hmmm...if it only
weren't against the rules to look...
 
  • #73
Originally posted by FZ+
Uh... is it my go?

"That Crusader was a particular example that made me mention Runsfeld...when ever a raving, slobbering hawk like Rumsfeld sees a problem, it must be HUGE."

Since you mention Rumsfeld, I'd say it was in the P&WA Forum, and guess it was Zero (hey, if you're going to guess, you might as well guess the Mentor of the Forum :smile:).
 
  • #74
Correct, Mentat!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K