Andy
- 76
- 14
Could people focus on 1 quote rather than several quotes.
The discussion revolves around a game where participants guess the authors of quotes taken from past posts on Physics Forums. The game involves identifying the original poster and the forum in which the quote appeared, with a focus on well-known contributors to the community.
Participants generally agree on the structure of the game but have differing opinions on the rules and the difficulty of guessing the quotes. There is no consensus on certain quotes, as multiple guesses are made without clear resolution.
Some participants express confusion about the rules and the nature of the quotes, indicating that there may be missing assumptions regarding the game's structure and expectations.
Members of the Physics Forums community interested in a light-hearted game that engages with past discussions and quotes from well-known contributors.
Originally posted by Tsunami
Nope. It was in How Stuff Works. Here's another of my favorites:
Who said this?
"I once got drunk with some illegal aliens. Then I think I lost my car for about six hours."
Originally posted by zoobyshoe
I remember this one well. Ivan
Seeking in mystics & pseudo
Originally posted by BoulderHead
Here is another big, long, hint;
"As for the number 666, what it represents is two thirds, and hence the second of three degrees: the first being 0 to 333, the second being 334 to 666, and the third being 667 to 1000. Which would be about right, for if you portrayed a symmetrical cross, where the top, bottom, left and right (sections) were equal in length, then by adding "an extension" equal in length at the base, you would have these same three degrees portrayed by the height of the cross: where the first two degrees (666 and below) exist below the horizontal plane, or "cross beam," and the third degree (667 and above) exists above it. So in this respect the number 217 (as opposed to 216) would be similar to 667."
When I read this only one member comes to my mind. How about you?
Did he insist that (Pi)(rround), not square?It reminds me of one of our faviorite crackpots, he's been gone for a long time, Fellow called himself Donde, had his own definition of Pi.
Was it Njorl?Originally posted by FZ+
Uh... is it my go?
"That Crusader was a particular example that made me mention Runsfeld...when ever a raving, slobbering hawk like Rumsfeld sees a problem, it must be HUGE."
Originally posted by FZ+
Uh... is it my go?
"That Crusader was a particular example that made me mention Runsfeld...when ever a raving, slobbering hawk like Rumsfeld sees a problem, it must be HUGE."