- 1,047
- 785
Will this toy stay upright if we get rid of the gimbal and fix the gyro's rotation axis w.r.t. the chassis?
The discussion centers on the importance of a gimbal in maintaining the stability of a gyro-stabilized two-wheeled toy. Removing the gimbal results in the gyroscope's inability to counteract lateral tilting, leading to instability. The participants illustrate this concept through experiments with gyroscopes, demonstrating that without the gimbal, the gyroscope's resistance to tilt is significantly diminished. The addition of constraining torque further complicates the stabilization, causing the system to tip over.
PREREQUISITESEngineers, hobbyists, and educators interested in robotics, mechanical design, and physics, particularly those focusing on stabilization technologies and gyroscopic systems.
FactChecker said:But if you brace the gyro so that it's desire for the secondary tilt is stopped, you will not feel any unusual resistance to your initial tilting. It would feel as though the gyro is not spinning at all.
Yes. I have a gyro where the gimbal can be braced against a table to prevent any lateral turning. When I push it forward, the desire to rotate laterally is exactly opposed by a force from the table. It feels like it is not a rotating gyro at all -- just rotating forward with no unusual opposition.Swamp Thing said:I'm beginning to get it -- I think -- based on adding the vector angular momentum that the new constraint would try to produce, on top of the original angular momentum of the spinning gyro. When we add the extra constraining torque, the resultant shows that the whole thing would tend to tip over.