Half-Life of He-6 Nucleus: 40 GeV

  • Thread starter Thread starter sawhai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Half life Life
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the half-life of a He-6 nucleus with a total energy of 40 GeV. The user initially calculates the mass of He-6 using E=mc², resulting in approximately 4.25 amu. They then apply the concept of time dilation, using the Lorentz factor (gamma) to find the half-life based on the stationary half-life value. Additionally, the user poses a question about the energy of an electron after a collision and whether it can ionize a tungsten atom, concluding that the energy of the recoiling electron is relevant for ionization. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying relativistic principles and energy calculations in nuclear physics.
sawhai
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question asks: "What is the half-life of a He-6 nucleus with total(kinetic+rest) energy E=40 GeV?"

How can we approach this problem?


Homework Equations



E=mc2 ;


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought of getting the mass of the He-6 using M=E/c2 =>40GeV/931.5MeV = 4.25 amu = 7.05*10^-26 kg. I am not sure if this helps and what to do next.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi sawhai! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

my guess is that you're supposed to find the speed, and then use time dilation to find the half-life (looking up the stationary half-life in a table)
 
Ok, I think I now understand. Here is what I did:

Gamma = E/mc^2 = 40GeV/6*931.5MeV = 7.15

t1/2 = t1/2 (Stationary)*gamma = 7.15*807ms

Does this sound ok?
 
looks ok! :smile:
 
Thanks. Now another question

An electron accelerated to 106 keV colides with another free electron and recoils. Its energy after the collision is 26 keV.
(a) What is the energy of the other electron that was initially at rest? I said E=106-26=80keV
(b)Assume the target electron is from the innermost shell of a Tungsten atom. Is the bound electron ionized in this collision? (the potential energy of the Tungsten ground state is 70keV). I said yes because 106keV is more than 70keV

Do you see any thing wrong with these answers?

Thanks
 
For b it is not because 106 is larger than 70, but because 80 is larger than 70.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top