Understanding Half Range Sine Series: A_0 Value and Theoretical Expectations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the coefficient \( a_0 \) in half range sine series for the function \( f(x) \). Participants clarify that \( a_0 \) must equal 0 for half range sine series, as it represents the odd extension of the function. The confusion arises from mistakenly applying the half range cosine series, which involves even extensions, leading to non-zero \( a_0 \) values. The correct approach is to utilize the half range sine series, which inherently results in \( a_0 = 0 \) due to the properties of odd functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series, specifically half range sine and cosine series.
  • Knowledge of function extensions (even and odd) in Fourier analysis.
  • Familiarity with the properties of odd functions and their Fourier coefficients.
  • Basic calculus skills for evaluating integrals involved in Fourier series calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of half range sine series coefficients, focusing on the integral calculations.
  • Explore the differences between even and odd function extensions in Fourier series.
  • Learn how to compute full range Fourier series for odd functions and their implications.
  • Review examples of half range sine series applications in signal processing and acoustics.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and professionals in engineering or physics who are working with Fourier series and need to clarify the distinctions between half range sine and cosine series.

foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


f(x) = x , 0 <x<1/2
1/2 , 1/2 < x <1
in this question , I am not convinced that a_ 0 = 0 for half range sine series , because i found that
I5muGdJ.jpg

but , thoerically , for half rang sine series , a_ 0 must be = 0 , ,am i right ? why the value of A- 0 that i got is not = 0 ? what's wrong with my working ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculation of ##a_0## is for the half range cosine series. It represents the even extension of your function. The half range sine series represents the odd extension of your function. They aren't the same thing.
 
LCKurtz said:
Your calculation of ##a_0## is for the half range cosine series. It represents the even extension of your function. The half range sine series represents the odd extension of your function. They aren't the same thing.
sorry , can you explain further ? i did http://i.imgur.com/I5muGdJ.jpg
because i want to show that for half rang sine series , a_0 = 0 , however , i get the value of a_ 0 not equal to 0 ... what's wrong with my working ?
 
There is nothing wrong with your calculations. They are FS of different functions. If we call the even extension of your ##f(x)## by ##f_{even}(x)##, its equation on ##(-1,1)## is$$
f_{even}(x) = \left \{ \begin{array}{r,l}
\frac 1 2,&-1<x<-\frac 1 2\\
-x, & -\frac 1 2 < x < 0\\
x, & 0 < x < \frac 1 2 \\
\frac 1 2, &\frac 1 2 < x < 1
\end{array}\right .$$
Similarly, the odd extension ##f_{odd}(x)## is given by$$
f_{odd}(x) = \left \{ \begin{array}{r,l}
-\frac 1 2,&-1<x<-\frac 1 2\\
x, & -\frac 1 2 < x < \frac 1 2\\
\frac 1 2, &\frac 1 2 < x < 1
\end{array}\right .$$These are both defined on ##(-1,1)## and of period ##2##. If you do the full range FS of ##f_{even}## you will find out that ##b_n=0## and you get only ##a_n## nonzero terms, and ##a_0## is what you have calculated. That's what the half range cosine series is.

If you expand ##f_{odd}## as a full range FS you will find all ##a_n = 0## and only ##b_n##'s are non-zero.

The half range formulas are just shortcuts for these two series taking advantage of the even and oddness. They are two different functions. But note they both represent the same thing on ##(0,1)##.
 
  • Like
Likes foo9008
LCKurtz said:
There is nothing wrong with your calculations. They are FS of different functions. If we call the even extension of your ##f(x)## by ##f_{even}(x)##, its equation on ##(-1,1)## is$$
f_{even}(x) = \left \{ \begin{array}{r,l}
\frac 1 2,&-1<x<-\frac 1 2\\
-x, & -\frac 1 2 < x < 0\\
x, & 0 < x < \frac 1 2 \\
\frac 1 2, &\frac 1 2 < x < 1
\end{array}\right .$$
Similarly, the odd extension ##f_{odd}(x)## is given by$$
f_{odd}(x) = \left \{ \begin{array}{r,l}
-\frac 1 2,&-1<x<-\frac 1 2\\
x, & -\frac 1 2 < x < \frac 1 2\\
\frac 1 2, &\frac 1 2 < x < 1
\end{array}\right .$$These are both defined on ##(-1,1)## and of period ##2##. If you do the full range FS of ##f_{even}## you will find out that ##b_n=0## and you get only ##a_n## nonzero terms, and ##a_0## is what you have calculated. That's what the half range cosine series is.

If you expand ##f_{odd}## as a full range FS you will find all ##a_n = 0## and only ##b_n##'s are non-zero.

The half range formulas are just shortcuts for these two series taking advantage of the even and oddness. They are two different functions. But note they both represent the same thing on ##(0,1)##.
do you mean to get a_ 0 = 0 , we have to do the full range sine series ... so , we just need to follow the book stated that for half range sine series , a_ 0 = 0 ?
we wouldn't get a_ 0 = 0 if we do half range sine series only ?
 
foo9008 said:
do you mean to get a_ 0 = 0 , we have to do the full range sine series ... so , we just need to follow the book stated that for half range sine series , a_ 0 = 0 ?

You just need to understand that when you do a half range sine expansion of ##f(x)##, you are really doing the full range expansion of ##f_{odd}(x)##. But ##f_{odd}(x)## is an odd function, so its FS will have only nonzero ##b_n## and you don't have to calculate the ##a_n##. The advantage of using the half range formula for ##b_n## is that the integral only involves ##f(x)## so you don't have to figure out the full formula for ##f_{odd}(x)##.
 
  • Like
Likes foo9008
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K