Hamiltonian conjugate dynamic variables

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
thecourtholio
Messages
18
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a charge ##q##, with mass ##m##, moving in the ##x-y## plane under the influence of a uniform magnetic field ##\vec{B}=B\hat{z}##. Show that the Hamiltonian $$ H = \frac{(\vec{p}-q\vec{A})^2}{2m}$$ with $$\vec{A} = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{B}\times\vec{r})$$ reduces to $$ H(x,y,p_x,p_y) = \frac{(p_x+\frac{1}{2}qBy)^2}{2m} + \frac{(p_y-\frac{1}{2}qBx)^2}{2m}$$
Demonstrate
$$ Q = \frac{(p_x+\frac{1}{2}qBy)}{qB} \qquad \qquad P = (p_y-\frac{1}{2}qBx) $$
are conjugate dynamic variables, given ##x, p_x, y, p_y## are, then express $$H(Q,P)$$ in terms of ##m## and the cyclotron frequency, ##\omega \frac{qB}{m}##

Show next that
$$ P' = \frac{(p_x-\frac{1}{2}qBy)}{qB} \qquad \qquad Q' = (p_y+\frac{1}{2}qBx) $$
Are yet another, linearly-independent, conjugate pair whose brackets with ##Q,P## necessarily vanish, i.e.
$$ [Q,Q'] = [Q,P'] = [P,Q'] = [P,P'] = 0 $$
Argue from the foregoing that ##Q',P'## must be constants of the motion

Homework Equations


Most are listed in problem statement. Definition of poisson bracket (PB): $$ [Q,P] = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial q}\frac{\partial P}{\partial p} - \frac{\partial Q}{\partial p}\frac{\partial P}{\partial q} $$
Fundamental PBs: ## [q_i,q_k] = [p_i,p_k] = 0, \ \ [q_i,p_k] = \delta_{ik}##

The Attempt at a Solution


My main question is, how exactly do I show that ##Q,P## are conjugate dynamical variables? Is this just by evaluating the PBs ##[Q_i, Q_k], [P_i, P_k], \text{ and } [Q_i,P_k]## and proving they preserve the fundamental PBs? So far, I have found
$$ [Q_i, Q_k]_{q,p} = 0 $$
And
$$ [P_i,P_k]_{q,p} = 0$$
But for ##[Q_i,P_k]_{q,p}## I find
$$ [Q_i,P_k]_{q,p} = \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}qB \neq 1 (or \neq \delta_{ik})$$
So is this not what I need to be doing or am I just evaluating it wrong?

And as for expressing the Hamiltonian as functions of ##Q## and ##P##, what do I need to do? My prof kind of worked out finding ##H(q(Q,P), p(Q,P))## for a harmonic oscillator by seeking a transformation of the form ##H(q(Q,P),p(Q,P)) = \frac{f^2(P)}{2m}##, but I'm having trouble figureing out how to do it in the reverse, like ##H(Q(q,p), P(q,p))## for this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not clear why, given the problem statement, you are using subscripts on the proposed conjugate variables of P and Q. There are just the two as I read the problem.
I get the correct Poisson bracket relations on [Q,P] so check your work.
 
jambaugh said:
I'm not clear why, given the problem statement, you are using subscripts on the proposed conjugate variables of P and Q. There are just the two as I read the problem.
I get the correct Poisson bracket relations on [Q,P] so check your work.

I was just using the indecies as good practice so i remember to use all indecies of Q or P later if they need it. But for [Q,P] I find
$$[Q,P] = \bigg[\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}\frac{\partial P}{\partial p_x} - \frac{\partial Q}{\partial p_x}\frac{\partial P}{\partial x}\bigg] + \bigg[ \frac{\partial Q}{\partial y}\frac{\partial P}{\partial p_y} - \frac{\partial Q}{\partial p_y}\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\bigg]$$
Where ##\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial P}{\partial p_x} = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial p_y} = 0## which make the PB
$$[Q,P] = -\frac{\partial Q}{\partial p_x}\frac{\partial P}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial Q}{\partial y}\frac{\partial P}{\partial p_y} = -(\frac{1}{qB})(-\frac{1}{2}qB) + (\frac{1}{2}qB)(1) = \frac{1}{2}+ \frac{1}{2}qB$$ so where am I going wrong?
 
[itex]\partial Q / \partial y = \tfrac{1}{2}[/itex] , [itex]\partial P/\partial p_y = 1[/itex] So total bracket is [itex]\tfrac{1}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2} = 1[/itex] . Or did I mess up?