• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Hamiltonian For Two-Particle System

  • Thread starter McCoy13
  • Start date
  • #1
74
0

Homework Statement


Show that the time-independent Schrödinger equation becomes
[tex]-\frac{h^{2}}{2(m_{1}+m_{2})}\nabla^{2}_{R}\psi-\frac{h^{2}}{2\mu}\nabla^{2}_{r}\psi+V(r)\psi = E\psi[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]-\frac{h^{2}}{2m_{1}}\nabla^{2}_{1}\psi-\frac{h^{2}}{2m_{2}}\nabla^{2}_{2}\psi+V(r)\psi = E\psi[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]\nabla^{2}_{1} = (\frac{\mu}{m_{2}})\nabla^{2}_{R}+\nabla^{2}_{r}[/tex]
[tex]\nabla^{2}_{2} = (\frac{\mu}{m_{1}})\nabla^{2}_{R}-\nabla^{2}_{r}[/tex]

Substituting into the Hamiltonian, I got
[tex]-\frac{h^{2}}{2(m_{1}+m_{2})}\nabla^{2}_{R}\psi-(\frac{h^{2}}{2})(\frac{m_{2}-m{1}}{m_{1}m_{2}})\nabla^{2}_{r}\psi+V(r)\psi = E\psi[/tex]

I think I must've calculated [tex]\nabla^{2}_{1} = (\frac{\mu}{m_{2}})\nabla^{2}_{R}+\nabla^{2}_{r}[/tex] and [tex]\nabla^{2}_{2} = (\frac{\mu}{m_{1}})\nabla^{2}_{R}-\nabla^{2}_{r}[/tex] incorrectly, but I can't for the life of me figure out why. I used chain rule to get [tex]\nabla_{R}[/tex] and [tex]\nabla_{r}[/tex] and then product rule to get the second derivatives. Since the derivatives of R and r with respect to r1 and r2 are simply constants, they don't contribute to the second derivative.

Thoughts?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
674
2
You need to show us the work you did to calculate those new laplacians, so that we can guide you where you went wrong. But you are right about those laplacians being wrong, I just can't tell you where you went wrong without seeing the work.
 
  • #3
74
0
I started with:
[tex]\nabla_{1} = \frac{\mu}{m_{2}}\nabla_{R}+\nabla_{r}[/tex]
[tex]\nabla_{2} = \frac{\mu}{m_{1}}\nabla_{R}-\nabla_{r}[/tex]

Then, for the second derivative (where I may be going wrong is that [tex]\nabla(\nabla) \neq \nabla^{2}[/tex]?) I used the product rule since [tex]\frac{\mu}{m_{2}}\nabla_{R}+\nabla_{r} = \frac{\partial R}{\partial r_{1}}\nabla_{R}+\frac{\partial r}{\partial r_{1}}\nabla_{r}[/tex] (that last partial should be partial of r with respect to r1, it's not showing up for some reason) and the same for [tex]\nabla_{2}[/tex]. Since [tex]\frac{\partial R}{\partial r_{1}}[/tex] is a constant and the same for partial r with respect to r1 (and the same again for r2) then those terms disappear and you are left with the equations I had in my original post.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
674
2
The first two lines are correct. Not sure what you are doing in the following paragraph.

Since you know [tex]\nabla_1[/tex], you just square it to get [tex]\nabla_1^2[/tex]. Then it becomes:

[tex]\nabla_1^2 = \left(\frac{\mu}{m_{2}}\nabla_{R}+\nabla_{r}\right)^2[/tex]

You then just expand it like you would for (a+b)^2. Do the same for the 2nd gradient.
 
  • #5
74
0
This is what I suspected. Thanks.
 

Related Threads on Hamiltonian For Two-Particle System

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
936
Replies
1
Views
754
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Top