I Hamiltonian formalism and partition function

AI Thread Summary
In Hamiltonian formalism, generalized coordinates and conjugate momenta are crucial for describing systems. For a dipole in a magnetic field, the Hamiltonian is defined as H = -μB cos(θ), where θ is the angle between the dipole moment and the magnetic field. Both θ and cos(θ) can be treated as generalized coordinates, with the associated conjugate momentum Pθ linked to angular momentum. This approach is essential for computing the partition function for the dipole system using the integral formulation. Understanding these relationships is key to analyzing the thermodynamic properties of the dipole in the magnetic field.
Simobartz
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
is it possible to find a (q,p) couple for a dipole in a magnetic field?
In hamiltonian formalism we have the generalized coordinates ##q_i## and the conjugates moments ##p_i##.
For a dipole in a give magnetic field ##B## the Hamiltonian is ##H=-\mu B cos \theta## where ##\theta## is the angle between ##\vec \mu## and ##\vec B##.
Can i consider ##\theta## or ##cos \theta## as a generalized coordinate? if yes what is the associated conjugate momentum ##P_\theta##?
I ask this question because i'd like to compute the partition function for a dipole in a magnetic field starting from ##\frac 1 {\hbar ^f} \int dr^fdp^f exp(-\beta H(r_1...r_f,p_1...p_f))##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Either ##\theta## or ##\cos\theta## could be considered as a generalised coordinate. The corresponding canonical momentum would be related to angular momentum.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top