Hamiltonian Principle: Uncovering Physics Beyond Euler-Lagrange Eq.s

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ledamage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Principle
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
1 reply · 2K views
ledamage
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

After some years of physics studies I'm accustomed to the Hamiltonian principle but I sometimes still wonder why physicists tacitly assume that the eq.s of motion of any physical theory (no matter if quantized or not, relativistic or not, strings etc.) can be obtained as Euler-Lagrange equations of some variational problem which severely restricts the possible eq.s of motion. Did I overlook something obvious? Even Ramond (in Field Theory - A Modern Primer) says
It is a most beautiful and awe-inspiring fact that all fundamental laws of Classical Physics can be understood in terms of one mathematical construct called the Action.
How do we know that maybe important new physics don't lie beyond the realm of Euler-Lagrange eq.s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's worth pointing out that Hamilton didn't develop his ideas to explain mechanics, but to explain optics. It was a decade or so before he realized that the very same mathematics that could explain the angles of rays of light in a telescope could also explain stuff like momentum in a mechanical system. Of course, this recognition kicked off the long chain of events that led to quantum mechanics.

I wonder if the successor to Euler-Lagrange is already out there somewhere, but not yet applied to an area of physics where it will be revolutionary.