[Hanging/Sliding Chain Problem] Confusion in Normal Force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a chain lying on a table with part of it hanging over the edge, specifically focusing on the normal force acting on the chain and the conditions under which the chain does not slide. Participants explore the implications of friction and the forces acting on both the hanging and resting portions of the chain.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assumption that the normal force equals m1*g, arguing that it should balance the total weight of the chain (m1+m2)*g.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial claim that the normal force should account for the entire weight of the chain, suggesting that the usual problem assumes zero friction and focuses on acceleration.
  • Some participants propose that the normal force on the horizontal part of the chain is indeed m1*g, as it is the only vertical force acting on that segment.
  • There is a suggestion that the presence of a pulley alters the dynamics, allowing the hanging part to exert an upward force of m2*g, which could clarify the situation.
  • One participant introduces the idea that the structure of the chain and the edge of the table could influence the forces, proposing that a rough edge would lead to a different maximum friction condition of μ(m1+m2)g.
  • A later reply emphasizes the need for experimental validation to determine the actual behavior of the chain under various conditions, suggesting that real-world testing could clarify the discrepancies in theoretical models.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct interpretation of the normal force and its implications for the problem. There is no consensus on whether the normal force should be considered as m1*g or (m1+m2)*g, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the effects of friction and the structure of the chain.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the assumptions made by standard solutions, particularly regarding the role of friction and the configuration of the chain at the edge of the table. The complexity of real-world scenarios is acknowledged, suggesting that theoretical models may not fully capture the dynamics involved.

champu123
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
This is a very basic problem which you all must have seen somewhere. But recently an itching doubt has come up to me regarding this problem.

Problem:
A chain lies on a table with some part of it hanging over the edge. Now if the coefficient of friction is μ, then find out the maximum part of the chain that can hang without sliding.

fa3.gif


The Usual Solution
See the solution to the problem here: http://cnx.org/content/m14806/latest/

Confusion
Now, in solving the problem, they considered the part of the chain on the table as "m1" and the hanging part as "m2".

Then, they say that:
μ*NormalForce = m2*g​
[itex]\Rightarrow[/itex] μ*m1*g = m2*g​

Now, my confusion is that why did they take normal force to be = m1*g??

Consider an FBD of the whole chain. Now the only force in the vertically above direction is the normal force. And it should balance all of the weight i.e. (m1+m2)*g.

So according to me, normal force = (m1+m2)*g.

However, all the solutions that I've seen take normal force = m1*g. But I just don't get it.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi champu123! :smile:
champu123 said:
Consider an FBD of the whole chain. Now the only force in the vertically above direction is the normal force. And it should balance all of the weight i.e. (m1+m2)*g.

So according to me, normal force = (m1+m2)*g.

i think you're right …

the usual question has zero friction, and asks you for the acceleration of the chain,

and even with no friction, that's less than g because of the increased normal force
 
Last edited:
What you say seems reasonable, but the result mu=m2/(m1+m2) is not reasonable.
That would say that as m1--> 0, the string would still remain at rest if mu were equal to at least 1.
Look at a free body diagram of the horizontal part of the string up to just short of the edge
The normal force on it is indeed m1g, since the only other vertical force is m1g down.
The answer is that there is a vertical upward force m2g on the hanging part of the string by the edge of the table. This is more clearly seen if you consider a pulley at the end of the table. Then the upward force by the pulley is seen from a FBD of the pulley.
 
Hi Meir! :smile:
Meir Achuz said:
The answer is that there is a vertical upward force m2g on the hanging part of the string by the edge of the table. This is more clearly seen if you consider a pulley at the end of the table. Then the upward force by the pulley is seen from a FBD of the pulley.

Yes, there has to be a vertical upward force m2g from the table somewhere

it depends on the structure of the chain where it is …

but unless the edge of the table is smooth, doesn't that still give the same maximum friction of µ(m1 + m2)g ? :wink:
 
Meir Achuz said:
Look at a free body diagram of the horizontal part of the string up to just short of the edge
The normal force on it is indeed m1g, since the only other vertical force is m1g down.

The only vertical force on it might not be just m1g. Depending on the structure of the chain, the hanging chain will also transmit some tangential force (tangential to the cross section of the chain) apart from the axial force. And this tangential force will add to the vertical force on m1.

Further,

Meir Achuz said:
The answer is that there is a vertical upward force m2g on the hanging part of the string by the edge of the table. This is more clearly seen if you consider a pulley at the end of the table. Then the upward force by the pulley is seen from a FBD of the pulley.

I think the structure/design of the edge plays a crucial role.

  • If there is pulley, then it's all right. The solution is correct in that case. All the weight of the hanging part will be taken up by the pulley. And as the pulley rotates freely, it will also offer no friction. So, in this case the net friction will only be μm1g.

  • However, if we introduce a rough edge. Then, whatever normal force it takes, it also apply friction accordingly. In this case, the net friction should be μ(m1+m2)g. Shouldn't it??

Correct me if I am wrong. But I think this is a huge blunder all the textbooks have been making. In a real case, the answer should be somewhere between the two extremes. It will be a complex encounter of the structure of chain/edge and the forces acting.

And only one thing can clear it for once and for all: Experiment. If someone could perform some experiment using a simple chain and see how far it can hang without falling. The value of "μ" could be obtained from a different experiment. And then see what the results match with. This should be fairly easy to perform in a school physics lab (I'm not in my school right now, vacations!).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K