Hard Mathematics-Physics Exercise

  • Thread starter Thread starter TuongQuach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise Hard
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving projectile motion under gravity, specifically neglecting air resistance. Participants are instructed to apply two distinct methods: first, using the equations of motion for gravity, and second, deriving the relationship between height and horizontal distance based on the curve's shape. The discussion emphasizes the importance of differentiating the curve equation to find time, horizontal velocity, and acceleration due to gravity, ensuring both methods yield consistent results. Additionally, participants are encouraged to explore a third approach to the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion equations
  • Knowledge of calculus for differentiation
  • Familiarity with the concept of gravity and its effects on motion
  • Ability to analyze curves and their equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations of motion for projectile motion under gravity
  • Learn about curve differentiation techniques in calculus
  • Explore the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
  • Investigate alternative methods for solving physics problems, such as energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in advanced problem-solving techniques in mathematics and physics.

TuongQuach
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For the diagram overleaf solve the problems by at least two different methods.
Firstly use you knowledge of the equations of motion for motion under gravity
where air resistance is neglected.

Secondly, knowing the shape of the curve, find the relationship between height
and horizontal distance using the same datum as the question.
Once you have the equation for the curve the ball takes differentiate with respect
to t as appropriate and after some manipulation find the time taken, the
horizontal velocity and the acceleration due to gravity.
Of course check that both methods deliver the same result.

Can you think of a third approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K