Harmonic Osclillator Purturbation Matrix Elements

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of perturbation theory to a harmonic oscillator, specifically examining the matrix elements of a perturbation defined as \( v = \epsilon x^2 \). Participants are exploring why certain matrix elements vanish and the implications for energy corrections in the context of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the conditions under which specific matrix elements \( V_{km} \) vanish, particularly for states with quantum numbers greater than 2. There is discussion about the parity of the states and how it affects the matrix elements. Some participants question the nature of the perturbation and its relation to the unperturbed potential.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and hints regarding the use of creation and annihilation operators to analyze the matrix elements. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the perturbation and its effects on energy levels, but no consensus has been reached on the complete understanding of the vanishing elements.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of perturbation theory and the specific forms of the harmonic oscillator's potential. There is mention of a second-order energy correction related to a perturbation proportional to \( x^4 \), indicating a broader context for the discussion.

teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I am trying to follow Sakurai's use of perturbation theory on a harmonic oscillator,

Homework Equations


Perturbation:
v=\epsilon x^2 , \epsilon << 1

Matrix elements:
V_{km}=<k|v|m>

The Attempt at a Solution


The book says that all other matrix elements besides V_{00}, V_{20}, and of the form V_{k0}=<k|v|0> vanish. I don't understand why. I see that the perturbation and the ground state have even parity, and that the SHO eigenstates alternate between even and odd parity with quantum number n. That should kill off the odd n states, but why should the even ones vanish too for k above 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They might be negligible.
I don't understand your perturbation - the harmonic oscillator has x^2, and your perturbation has the same shape?
 
Yes, sorry if that was not clear. The unperturbed potential is V_{0}=1/2 m \omega x^2, and the perturbation is the same thing multiplied by \epsilon.
 
Okay. Then it's easy to predict how the energy levels will change. I would expect expressions like Vk2 and so on to be non-zero as well, but they could be too small to be relevant (and I did not calculate it).
 
Ok. Sakurai says they "vanish", which might mean that they are negligible. The motivation behind this is my trying to solve for the second order energy correction to a perturbation proportional to x^4. I thought I could make most of the terms in the sum go away if I was able to follow whatever procedure Sakurai did in the book for the x^2 perturbation.
 
Of the ##V_{k0}## elements, the only non-zero ones are for k=0 and k=2. Hint: Rewrite x in terms of creation and annihilation operators.
 
Got it. Thank you.For any state higher than 2, they all go to zero because the creation operator to the second power can only get you to the |2> state.
 
Spot on. In general, any state ##|n\rangle## will have a non-zero matrix element with itself, ##|n+2\rangle##, and ##|n-2\rangle##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
3K