Harnessing energy from piezioelectric roadways

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fireseed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for harvesting energy from piezoelectric crystals embedded in roadways, focusing on the theoretical energy output based on vehicle pressure and movement. Participants explore the feasibility, design considerations, and practical challenges of such systems, including the impact on vehicle efficiency and road integrity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a Wikipedia fact about quartz producing 12,500 V under a specific force and seeks to calculate energy output based on average vehicle weight and contact area.
  • Another participant emphasizes that voltage alone is insufficient to determine energy availability, as current must also be considered.
  • Concerns are raised about the minimal energy generated by piezoelectric sensors due to road surface material, suggesting complex signal processing is needed to detect vehicles.
  • Some participants propose hypothetical designs for energy harvesting, such as deflection calculations based on vehicle weight and speed.
  • Several participants argue that energy harvested would likely be offset by losses in vehicle efficiency, questioning the practicality of such systems.
  • Alternative ideas are suggested, such as using air hoses to convert mechanical pressure into electrical energy, although doubts about their effectiveness are expressed.
  • Discussion includes the potential for energy harvesting from road deformation, but skepticism remains regarding the overall energy yield and cost-effectiveness of piezoelectric systems.
  • Participants note that the required deflection for effective energy generation may be impractical for drivers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the feasibility and efficiency of energy harvesting from piezoelectric materials in roadways. There is no consensus on the practicality or effectiveness of the proposed systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations such as the dependence on vehicle weight, road surface material, and the potential impact on vehicle fuel efficiency. The discussion also touches on the challenges of designing a system that can effectively harvest energy without causing significant road deformation.

fireseed
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to determine how much energy can be, in ideal circumstances, harvested from piezoelectric crystals that draw pressure from being buried in roadways.
To start, we found a basic fact on Wikipedia;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectric

"...a 1 cm cube of quartz with 2 kN (500 lbf) of correctly applied force can produce a voltage of 12,500 V."

Using what means and understanding we possess, we determined so far that;
-that the average wheel on a car would be roughly 5 kN
-that .20m of a wheel touches the ground on average with an area of 0.034m^2

Now based on my understanding of piezoelectricity, I am not sure as to whether time would have to be factored in as well or not. So basically if we could come up with some kind of a unit measurement/equation to determine how much voltage a 1 cm cube of quartz would put off with the force of the average vehicle going at an average speed, we could then extrapolate that to conclude exactly how much power could be generated from a roadway of any given length and thus the overall energy potential of piezoelectricity as a whole.

Overall, we'll have one more sound fact to give hope to the world that could be.
But I seem to have taken this equation as far as I can on my own at the time, so I need someone's help.
Anything at all would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Voltage alone doesn't really tell you anything useful about the energy available - you'd need a current. And note, conservation of energy applies: any energy generated by the crystals has to come from the car engine and not much of a car's energy is lost as rolling resistance on a road.
 
So then is there any direction you could suggest that I look into further my progress with this question?
 
From talking to people who use the piezeo sensors for speed/traffic measurements - very little signal is generated because of the road surface material over the top of the sensors.
They have to do some pretty complex signal processing to even detect a car.
 
fireseed said:
So then is there any direction you could suggest that I look into further my progress with this question?
Well, I guess you could pick an arbitrary deflection (it's up to you to design it, right?) and calculate based on that. Ie, try these numbers:

A car weighs 5000N
You design your device to deflect 1m, like a spring
The contact patch is 20 cm long and the car is moving at 10 m/sec (so the contact area is changed 50 times a second)
 
You don't get something for nothing. I am guessing that the energy you get would be offset by losses elsewhere like loss of gas mileage in all the vehicles that travel the road. So if you expect to harvest free energy I doubt it will work.
 
nottheone said:
You don't get something for nothing. I am guessing that the energy you get would be offset by losses elsewhere like loss of gas mileage in all the vehicles that travel the road. So if you expect to harvest free energy I doubt it will work.

The cars are already deforming the road surface without any reclamation of that energy. It would be no different than trying to generate energy from the sound the tires produce: they're going to be making noise whether you do something with that noise or not. The real problem is whether the cost of engineering and installing any such system is paid for by the energy produced.
 
What about something even simpler like specially designed 1/2 inch air hoses, that when ran over, take the mechanical pressure applied, and force air out, and transfer that into electric energy? Wouldn't that be simple enough to work?
 
zoobyshoe said:
The cars are already deforming the road surface without any reclamation of that energy. It would be no different than trying to generate energy from the sound the tires produce: they're going to be making noise whether you do something with that noise or not. The real problem is whether the cost of engineering and installing any such system is paid for by the energy produced.

The roads have to handle relatively heavy loads like tractor trailers, they aren't deforming much with a car or it would really sag under a truck. And if they are already sagging then they would have to sag an additional amount for the piezo wouldn't they?
 
  • #10
fireseed said:
What about something even simpler like specially designed 1/2 inch air hoses, that when ran over, take the mechanical pressure applied, and force air out, and transfer that into electric energy? Wouldn't that be simple enough to work?

That would definitely kill gas mileage, no net gain.
 
  • #11
nottheone said:
The roads have to handle relatively heavy loads like tractor trailers, they aren't deforming much with a car or it would really sag under a truck. And if they are already sagging then they would have to sag an additional amount for the piezo wouldn't they?

Well, this is not quite right as you would just exchange some part of the road for piezos, so you just switch from deforming concrete, where most energy used for the deformation will finally end up as a slight increase in temperature towards deforming piezos, where you can harvest a little bit of the energy. Nevertheless I think the amount of energy you can get is far too small to make the use of expensive piezos sensible. Also the change of temperature between summer and winter should be a great problem at most locations.

However piezos have been used to harvest energy in other locations. Although I think this is more or less a marketing gag, there is a club in the netherlands, which uses a dancefloor with piezos: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/24/w...html?_r=3&pagewanted=2&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
 
  • #12
Cthugha said:
Well, this is not quite right as you would just exchange some part of the road for piezos, so you just switch from deforming concrete, where most energy used for the deformation will finally end up as a slight increase in temperature towards deforming piezos, where you can harvest a little bit of the energy.
Yes. The amount of deformation, the actual deflection from the previous dimension required to produce voltage, is very slight but requires a lot of pressure, proportionately, to accomplish. Crystals are very hard. You can scratch glass with a quartz crystal.
 
  • #13
russ_watters said:
Well, I guess you could pick an arbitrary deflection (it's up to you to design it, right?) and calculate based on that. Ie, try these numbers:

A car weighs 5000N
You design your device to deflect 1m, like a spring
The contact patch is 20 cm long and the car is moving at 10 m/sec (so the contact area is changed 50 times a second)

Do I understand this correctly -- a 1 m deflection? Wouldn't a cm be more reasonable? The car has to push the device down by this distance, and then "climb" up out of the depression in the road that has been created. As a driver, I doubt I'm willing to tolerate more than a cm or 2.

Of course, the car must consume more gas to climb out of the dip in the road, which I guess is the whole point. If you really want to burn gasoline/petrol to generate electricity, you might as well buy a generator.
 
  • #14
Redbelly98 said:
Do I understand this correctly -- a 1 m deflection? Wouldn't a cm be more reasonable? The car has to push the device down by this distance, and then "climb" up out of the depression in the road that has been created. As a driver, I doubt I'm willing to tolerate more than a cm or 2.

Of course, the car must consume more gas to climb out of the dip in the road, which I guess is the whole point. If you really want to burn gasoline/petrol to generate electricity, you might as well buy a generator.
I'd be amazed if the deflection required anything on the order of a milimeter much less a centimeter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
17K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K