Have i got the DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PERMITTIVITY AND PERMEABILITY Right?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between permittivity and permeability in electromagnetic theory. Permittivity (\(\epsilon\)) represents a material's resistance to the formation of an electric field, while permeability (\(\mu\)) indicates a medium's capacity to support the formation of a magnetic field. The confusion arises from their simultaneous appearance in equations, such as the Helmholtz equation (\(\nabla^2 E = -\omega^2 \mu \epsilon E\)). The conversation emphasizes the historical context and the relationship between electric (\(\vec{E}\)) and magnetic fields (\(\vec{B}\)) as defined by Maxwell's equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field theory
  • Knowledge of wave equations in physics
  • Basic grasp of Fourier analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave equations from Maxwell's equations
  • Learn about the physical significance of the Helmholtz equation
  • Explore the relationship between \(\vec{D}\), \(\vec{E}\), \(\vec{H}\), and \(\vec{B}\)
  • Investigate the role of permittivity and permeability in different media
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding electromagnetic theory and its applications.

BINNOY.S.P
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Just wanted to know the difference between permittivity and permeability.

As far as I researched, permittivity is resistance to the creation of electric field and permeability is like an allowance of a medium to the creation of a magnetic field. Is it right?

I get confused because in some of the equations, both pemittivity and permeability occur in the numerator . That boggles me.

Like
2E = -ω2.μ.ε.E

it should be E bar above. But i don't know how to but a bar. The example is known as Helmhotz equation something.

BINNOY
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trouble is caused by historical confusion about the physical meaning of the em. field componentents in matter. Nowadays, having relativity at hand, we know that \vec{E} and \vec{B} as well as \vec{D} and [/itex]\vec{H}[/itex] belong together, while traditionally people thought one should associate \vec{E} and [/itex]\vec{H}[/itex]. That's why you define the permitivity \epsilon and permeability \mu (for a homogeneous isotropic medium and working in Heaviside-Lorentz units, i.e., \epsilon and [/itex]\mu[/itex] are dimensionless constants and unity in a vacuum) for a medium at rest as
\vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}, \quad \vec{H}=\frac{1}{\mu} \vec{B}.
Now the homogeneous Maxwell equations read
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E} + \frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0,
and the inhomogeneous ones
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{H} -\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{D}=\frac{1}{c} \vec{j}, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{D}=\rho,
where \vec{j} and \vec{\rho} are the free electric current and charge densities, i.e., the currents and charges added to the ones constituting the medium.

If you now insert the consititutive relations, you can derive the wave equations for \vec{E} and [/itex]\vec{B}[/itex], and then you'll get the Helmholtz equation when using the Fourier ansatz
\vec{E}(t,\vec{x})=\tilde{\vec{E}}(\vec{x}) \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t)
and analogous for all the other field quantities as well. Note that (neglecting spatial dispersion) the permitivity and permeablity are functions of \omega.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
41K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K