MHB Having trouble with the Laplace Transform

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation using Laplace transforms, specifically $y'' + 4y' + 4y = e^t$ with initial conditions $y(0) = 1$ and $y'(0) = 0$. The user successfully derived the expression for $Y$ but encountered difficulties with partial fraction decomposition. They initially found $A = 1$ but were unsure about determining $B$, later opting for polynomial long division to simplify the problem. The final solution yielded $1 - 2e^{-2t} + 2te^{-2t}$, leading to a question about why Wolfram Alpha represents the constant term as a delta function. The explanation provided clarifies that the Laplace transform of the delta function equals 1, linking it back to the original equation.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Solve by Laplace Transforms.

$y'' + 4y' + 4y = e^t$ $y(0) = 1$, $y'(0) = 0$So I've got

$s^2Y - s + 4sY - 1 + 4Y = \frac{1}{s+1}$

then I got:
$ Y = \frac{s^2+2s+2}{(s+2)(s+2)}$

Now here is where I am getting lost on the partial fraction decomposition..

I've got $s^2+2s+2 = A(s+2) + B$ I got $A =1$ but can't remember what to do to get $B$ .. is $B=0$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I solved it using polynomial long division which really sucked.

But I ended up with $1 - 2e^{-2t} + 2te^{-2t}$ but why does wolphram alpha replace the 1 with a $\delta$?
 
shamieh said:
Nevermind, I solved it using polynomial long division which really sucked.

But I ended up with $1 - 2e^{-2t} + 2te^{-2t}$ but why does wolphram alpha replace the 1 with a $\delta$?

... because is ...

$\displaystyle \mathcal {L} \{ \delta (t) \} = \int_{0}^{\infty} \delta (t)\ e^{- s\ t}\ d t = e^{0} = 1 \implies \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{ 1\} = \delta(t)\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K