Heat engine/thermal efficiency question

  • Thread starter Thread starter apaerie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Heat
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the thermal efficiency of a heat engine operating with a gas having a gamma value of 1.25 and an initial temperature of 300K. The user initially calculated the thermal efficiency as 18% but later discovered a miscalculation in the heat input (QH), specifically in determining Q23, which was incorrectly calculated as 303J. After correcting this error, the user was able to find the correct thermal efficiency. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations and the potential impact of significant figures and rounding errors on results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles, specifically heat engines
  • Familiarity with the Carnot cycle and thermal efficiency calculations
  • Knowledge of specific heat capacities and the concept of gamma (γ)
  • Proficiency in handling equations related to work output and heat transfer
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Carnot efficiency formula and its application in heat engines
  • Learn about the significance of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Explore the relationship between work output and heat transfer in thermodynamic cycles
  • Investigate common errors in thermal efficiency calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying thermodynamics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone involved in engineering or energy systems who seeks to understand heat engine efficiency calculations.

apaerie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure shows the cycle for a heat engine that uses a gas having gamma =1.25. The initial temperature is T1=300K, and this engine operates at 20 cycles per second. What is the engine's thermal efficiency?

[URL]http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1074111/3/knight_Figure_19_54.jpg[/URL]


Homework Equations


[PLAIN]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/a/1/7a19ba3fdf776ed7bf92a998cb72996c.png=W[SUB]out[/SUB]/W[SUB]in[/SUB]

[PLAIN]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/a/1/7a19ba3fdf776ed7bf92a998cb72996c.png=1-Q[SUB]c[/SUB]/Q[SUB]H[/SUB]


The Attempt at a Solution


The first question had asked what was the power output of the engine and I managed to get the correct answer for that, so I'm very sure that my values for Q12, Q23, and Q31 are correct. Since Q23 was a positive value, I figured it was the work put in. I then used the power output that I had calculated and divided it by Q23, multiply by a hundred, which gave me 18% which turned out to be wrong.

I then tried the second equation and using the same value (Q23) for QH and adding the absolute values of Q12 and Q31 together to get Qc, divide Qc by QH, and subtracted the result from 1. It still turned out to be 18%, which I already knew was wrong.

So I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong here. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

You're approach looks entirely correct. If this is being checked by submitting online, and you don't know what the "correct" answer is, then there might be some issue with significant figures, or rounding error -- in which case you got the right answer, but it isn't registering.

Can you post your calculations of W12, W23, and the three Q's?

EDIT: I have now worked out the problem, and it is quite different than 18%, so I suspect you calculated the Q's incorrectly. If you show your work, I could help find the error.
 
Last edited:
Redbelly98 said:
Welcome to Physics Forums.

You're approach looks entirely correct. If this is being checked by submitting online, and you don't know what the "correct" answer is, then there might be some issue with significant figures, or rounding error -- in which case you got the right answer, but it isn't registering.

Can you post your calculations of W12, W23, and the three Q's?

EDIT: I have now worked out the problem, and it is quite different than 18%, so I suspect you calculated the Q's incorrectly. If you show your work, I could help find the error.

I figured it out. You're right, I did miscalculate one of the Q's. At the beginning, I calculated QH (or Q23) to be 303J but I know now that was where I went wrong, so I managed to get the right answer now. Thanks for all your trouble :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
27K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K