Heat equation from Navier Stokes eqns?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the Navier-Stokes equations and the heat conduction equation. It is established that the heat conduction term, represented as ##\kappa \nabla T##, is already present in the energy equation of the Navier-Stokes framework. The participants clarify that while the Navier-Stokes equations primarily address momentum transport, energy transport is handled separately, leading to the conclusion that the heat equation can be derived by isolating the conduction term. Additionally, the historical context of these equations is explored, noting that Euler's equations predate the Navier-Stokes equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Navier-Stokes equations
  • Familiarity with heat conduction principles
  • Knowledge of momentum and energy transport equations
  • Basic grasp of vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the heat conduction equation from the energy equation in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the historical development of fluid dynamics equations, focusing on Euler's and Navier-Stokes equations
  • Learn about the mechanical energy balance equation and its relation to the Navier-Stokes equations
  • Investigate the implications of momentum conservation in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers involved in fluid dynamics, particularly those focusing on heat transfer and energy transport mechanisms.

pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
Can you derive the heat conduction equation from the navier stokes equations (particularly the energy eqn)?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The energy equation contains a heat conducting term already (the one containing ##\kappa \nabla T##), so then if you zeroed out all the other terms, then yes, you could get the heat equation. Since conduction is actually one of several parts of the energy equation, though, I don't know why you would want to do this. There are many other factors in energy transport.
 
boneh3ad said:
The energy equation contains a heat conducting term already (the one containing ##\kappa \nabla T##), so then if you zeroed out all the other terms, then yes, you could get the heat equation. Since conduction is actually one of several parts of the energy equation, though, I don't know why you would want to do this. There are many other factors in energy transport.
Thanks. Question.

Are equations like potential flow, Euler's, heat conduction equation formulated before the Navier Stokes equations? I see that Euler existed before Navier&Stokes.
If so, then were the Navier Stokes equations formulated on the basis of these simplified equations?
 
pyroknife said:
Thanks. Question.

Are equations like potential flow, Euler's, heat conduction equation formulated before the Navier Stokes equations? I see that Euler existed before Navier&Stokes.
If so, then were the Navier Stokes equations formulated on the basis of these simplified equations?

A minor comment- the Navier Stokes equation(s) is/are concerned with momentum transport. Just as mass transport is handled by a different equation-the continuity equation- energy transport is handled by it's own equation. All three equations are, to some degree, independent:

http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~mspieg/mmm/Conserveq.pdf
 
Andy Resnick said:
A minor comment- the Navier Stokes equation(s) is/are concerned with momentum transport. Just as mass transport is handled by a different equation-the continuity equation- energy transport is handled by it's own equation. All three equations are, to some degree, independent:

http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~mspieg/mmm/Conserveq.pdf
Wait I thought the Navier Stokes equations refers to the 3 conversation equations for mass, momentum, and energy? And hence the pluralness of "equationS?" If its just the momentum equation then why is it not called the Navier Stokes Equation?
 
Momentum conservation results in one equation per spatial dimension, hence there are three momentum equations.

Really it's just a semantics debate, though.
 
boneh3ad said:
Momentum conservation results in one equation per spatial dimension, hence there are three momentum equations.

Really it's just a semantics debate, though.
Oh yeah I forget it is a vector equation. So the NS equations technically include the continuity and energy eqn?
 
pyroknife said:
Oh yeah I forget it is a vector equation. So the NS equations technically include the continuity and energy eqn?
No. It only addresses momentum. The continuity equation can be combined with the NS equation to obtain a different form of the equation, but its primary focus is still momentum. It is also possible to obtain the "mechanical energy balance equation" by dotting the NS equation with the velocity vector. This can be subtracted from the "overall energy balance equation " to yield the so-called "thermal energy balance equation".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K