Heat transfer across an infinite plate of constant thickness

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the modeling of heat transfer through a plate using Fourier's equation, specifically examining the implications of treating the plate as infinite versus finite in width and length. The scope includes theoretical considerations and numerical modeling techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the implications of modeling the plate as infinite in width and length, suggesting that it may affect the heat transfer analysis.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the assumption of infinite dimensions in heat exchangers.
  • A participant cites a textbook that describes a one-dimensional model of heat transfer across a 5cm thick tile, questioning the differences that would arise if a three-dimensional model were used instead.
  • A similar point is raised again, emphasizing the potential complexities of analyzing heat transfer if the plate were considered finite, particularly regarding the outer portions of the plate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the implications of modeling the plate as infinite versus finite, with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed regarding the impact on heat transfer analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight assumptions made in modeling, such as the simplification to one-dimensional heat flow and the challenges of analyzing heat transfer in finite models, but do not resolve these issues.

mattyboson12
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
When modelling the heat transfer through a plate using fouriers equation, what difference would it make if the width and length of the plate were set to a specified value rather than being infinite?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't understand how you consider width and length of heat exchanger to be infinite.
 
I read the following in a textbook:

"The temperature in the tile is to be analysed by solving Fourier's equation numerically using a finite difference technique. To simplify the problem, the following two assumptions are made: It is modeled as a one-dimensional problem. Only heat flow across the 5cm thickness is considered. The tile is assumed to behave like an infinite plate of 5cm thickness"

I was just curious as to what difference it would make to the heat transfer if you considered a 3 dimensional model instead
 
mattyboson12 said:
I read the following in a textbook:

"The temperature in the tile is to be analysed by solving Fourier's equation numerically using a finite difference technique. To simplify the problem, the following two assumptions are made: It is modeled as a one-dimensional problem. Only heat flow across the 5cm thickness is considered. The tile is assumed to behave like an infinite plate of 5cm thickness"

I was just curious as to what difference it would make to the heat transfer if you considered a 3 dimensional model instead
I suppose it's like considering uniform effect over the heat exchanger plate. If it is considered finite then heat transfer via outer portion of that plate is difficult to analyse. I am not fully sure but I suppose it's like it.
 

Attachments

  • C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_heat-exchanger_gif.png
    C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_heat-exchanger_gif.png
    19.4 KB · Views: 503

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K