Heat transfer and combustion correlations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the correlations for heat transfer by natural convection from a horizontal pipe to the atmosphere, specifically focusing on the simplification of the Nusselt number equation and the calculation of the heat transfer coefficient. Participants explore the mathematical relationships and calculations involved, addressing uncertainties and challenges in deriving the correct coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on how two correlations for heat transfer can be similar and requests assistance in simplifying the given equation.
  • Another participant provides a detailed breakdown of the Nusselt number equation and suggests steps for simplification, indicating that the constants should lead to a specific form.
  • A participant notes discrepancies in their calculations, specifically not obtaining the expected coefficient of 1.34, and suggests verifying units.
  • There is a discussion about the treatment of the variable d in the simplification process, with some participants explaining how to handle the exponentiation and division.
  • Several participants express their struggles with the calculations and seek further assistance, indicating a lack of clarity in the steps required to reach the solution.
  • One participant mentions the need to clarify what is meant by "distributing through the exponents" and receives an explanation about combining like terms.
  • Another participant shares their algebraic expression for the heat transfer coefficient and seeks feedback on their approach.
  • There are multiple requests for help in progressing through the calculations, with some participants expressing frustration over their inability to resolve the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the simplification process and the calculations involved. Multiple competing views and approaches are presented, with some participants confirming the correctness of earlier contributions while others express ongoing confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific constants and variables, but there is uncertainty regarding the values and their application in the equations. Some calculations appear to depend on assumptions about unit consistency and the treatment of variables, which remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in engineering and physics who are dealing with heat transfer problems, particularly those involving natural convection and the application of Nusselt number correlations.

Mitch1
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Hi am a bit stuck on understanding how these two correlations can be similar I am wondering if anyone can ahead any light
Can anyone solve

Correlation for heat transfer by natural convection from a horizontal pipe to atmosphere is;

Nu = 0.53Gr^0.25Pr^0.25
Nu = hd / k

Where, Gr = αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g / μ²
And Pr = Cpμ / k

Show that the above correlation can be simplified to;
h ≈ 1.34 (Ts-Tf / d)^0.25

α=3.077 x 10^-3
ρ=1.086
Cp=1.0063
k=2.816 x 10^-5
μ=1.962 x 10^-5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mitch1 said:
Nu = 0.53Gr^0.25Pr^0.25
Nu = hd / k

Where, Gr = αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g / μ²
And Pr = Cpμ / k
Plug in the information:
## Nu = 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} = hd / k ##
##h = \frac{k}{d} 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} ##
Distribute through the exponents across multiplication, and compute the constants, and you should get an answer similar to
##a \left( \frac{(Ts-Tf)}{d}\right)^{.25}##
 
Note: When I carried out the calculation, I did not get 1.34 as a coefficient. You may want to verify all you units to make sure they are balanced.
 
RUber said:
Plug in the information:
## Nu = 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} = hd / k ##
##h = \frac{k}{d} 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} ##
Distribute through the exponents across multiplication, and compute the constants, and you should get an answer similar to
##a \left( \frac{(Ts-Tf)}{d}\right)^{.25}##

Hi ruber
Thanks for your reply!
All units are correct as stated I am also unsure how to get 1.34 I have tried various ways.
When I follow your advise how would d^3 disappear in a sense as this is a unknown
Thanks again
 
The ##d^3 ## doesn't disappear, you have ##\frac{(d^3)^{.25}}{d}=\frac{1}{d^{.25}}##.
What is g? That constant was not given in your original post.
 
RUber said:
The ##d^3 ## doesn't disappear, you have ##\frac{(d^3)^{.25}}{d}=\frac{1}{d^{.25}}##.
What is g? That constant was not given in your original post.
I unstandard that now thanks a lot!
And g is 9.81 it is just gravity
 
did you try:

(d^4)/d

I`m working on same question.
 
blitzman said:
did you try:

(d^4)/d

I`m working on same question.
Hi, would that not result in d^3
 
Anyone get any further with this question? Its really becoming a bug bear of mine I can't seem to get it any further along...
 
  • #10
Big Jock said:
Anyone get any further with this question? Its really becoming a bug bear of mine I can't seem to get it any further along...
RUber gave the solution essentially completely in post #2. I don't see what the problem is.

Chet
 
  • #11
your 100% correct Chet I have got the correct answer my post was in haste
 
  • #12
Big Jock said:
your 100% correct Chet I have got the correct answer my post was in haste
Hi again I have completed this question however I am unsure how we get from
(D^3)^.25 /d. = (1/d^.25)
 
  • #13
Mitch1 said:
Hi again I have completed this question however I am unsure how we get from
(D^3)^.25 /d. = (1/d^.25)
It's just basic algebra.

\frac{(d^3)^{0.25}}{d}=\frac{d^{0.75}}{d}=\frac{1}{d^{0.25}}
Chet
 
  • #14
Chestermiller said:
It's just basic algebra.

\frac{(d^3)^{0.25}}{d}=\frac{d^{0.75}}{d}=\frac{1}{d^{0.25}}
Chet
Hi Chet
Yes I realized once I posted it
Thanks anyway
 
  • #15
Am I allowed to ask what "Distribute through the exponents across multiplication, and compute the constants" means for mere mortals struggling along. Or is that too much of an embarrassing admission?
 
  • #16
rjc45y said:
Am I allowed to ask what "Distribute through the exponents across multiplication, and compute the constants" means for mere mortals struggling along. Or is that too much of an embarrassing admission?
What I meant by "distribute through across multiplication" was:
##(ab^2c^a)^x = a^x b^{2x} c^{ax}##
Then, combine all your like terms.
 
  • #17
Many thanks, got the correct answer but at the mo' it's x10^-3 out, will preserver
 
  • #18
RUber said:
Plug in the information:
## Nu = 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} = hd / k ##
##h = \frac{k}{d} 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} ##

I am having trouble getting my head round this problem. I think I am trying to do to much to quickly and confusing the numbers when I multiply out the equation.
Am I on the right line to multiply by μ² 1st? before I distribute through across multiplication?
For (\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} I have got to = 0.915.
 
  • #19
Yes you are correct on both counts
 
  • #20
Do I need to multiply 0.915 that I found by μ2? and also 0.53 by μ2
 
  • #21
I am not sure what you are trying to do? Your 0.915 is essentially Pr but you can just plug the values into the equation you quoted in post #18
 
  • #22
Try working out the nusselt number with the values given and 0.915 you worked out.
Once you have nu you can then put this into the heat transfer coefficient equation
 
  • #23
NU = 47.55(d3(Ts-Tf))

Does that look close?
 
  • #24
Yes that looks correct but there needs to be a power of 0.25 at the end of your equation
 
  • #25
I missed that by mistake sorry.

Your help has been great and really got me past my mental block. I am 10-3 out but should I have used k in W not kW?
 
  • #26
Your thermal conductivity is given in kW m-1 k-1 this will give your answer x10-3 kW m-2 k-2 which when you covert to W you get your answer
 
  • #27
Apologies for the old thread resurrection but I can't get to grips with this.

I've tried it my long complicated way and the way suggested above and am struggling solving the equation.

Once I've punched in the numbers I end up with:

h=((1.49248x10^-5)/d)x((0.43433xd^0.75x(Ts-Tf))/0.0044) x0.915Please can someone come to my rescue?
 
  • #28
It's like the 0.0044 is in my way which was formerly (u^2)^0.25
 
  • #29
Rogue said:
Apologies for the old thread resurrection but I can't get to grips with this.

I've tried it my long complicated way and the way suggested above and am struggling solving the equation.

Once I've punched in the numbers I end up with:

h=((1.49248x10^-5)/d)x((0.43433xd^0.75x(Ts-Tf))/0.0044) x0.915Please can someone come to my rescue?
Any chance you can write this out using LaTex. https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/

And please express your results first in terms of algebraic parameters, and then show how you substituted. I would like to see your whole derivation.
 
  • #30
My algebraic expression:

##h= \frac {k}{d} 0.53 ( \frac { \alpha p^2 d^3 (T_s - T_f) g} {u^2})^{0.25} (\frac {Cpu}{k})^{0.25}##
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K