Simplifying the Natural Convection Heat Transfer Correlation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a correlation for heat transfer by natural convection from a horizontal pipe to the atmosphere. Participants are working through the mathematical steps involved in deriving the simplification of the correlation, which includes the Grashof and Prandtl numbers, and how to manipulate the equations to arrive at a specific form of the heat transfer coefficient.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the initial correlation for heat transfer and the relevant equations for Grashof and Prandtl numbers.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the order of operations needed to simplify the equation.
  • A subsequent post suggests that distributing the exponent of 0.25 across the terms is necessary.
  • Participants discuss the manipulation of terms, including how to handle the powers of d and the numerical constants involved.
  • One participant shares their intermediate results and seeks confirmation on whether their approach is correct.
  • Another participant encourages experimentation with the calculations to reach the desired form of the equation.
  • Eventually, a participant arrives at a simplified expression for h and proposes a derived form of the correlation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the steps needed to simplify the correlation, but there is no consensus on the specific order of operations or the correctness of intermediate steps until the final expression is reached.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the manipulation of exponents and the arrangement of terms, indicating potential gaps in understanding the mathematical process involved in the simplification.

Who May Find This Useful

Students or individuals interested in heat transfer principles, particularly those studying natural convection and related mathematical correlations.

Tiberious
Messages
71
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



An appropriate correlation for heat transfer by natural convection from a horizontal pipe to the atmosphere is Nu=0.53Gr^0.25 Pr^0.25

Where,

Gr= (αp^2 d^3 (T_1-T_f )g)/μ^2

And

Pr⁡〖= (C_p μ)/k〗

Show the above correlation can be simplified to

h ≈1.34((T_s-T_f)/d)^0.25 Wm^(-2) K^(-1)

When air has the values listed below

α=3.077∙10^(-3 ) K^(-1)
p=1.086 kg m^(-3)
C_p=1.0063 kj kg^(-1) K^(-1)
k=2.816∙10^(-5) kWm^(-1) K^(-1)
μ=1.962∙10^(-5) kg m^(-1) s^(-1)

The Attempt at a Solution

Inputting the Grashof and Prandtl number equations:

Nu=0.53〖(αp^2 d^3 (T_1-T_f )g)/μ^2 〗^0.25 〖(C_p μ)/k〗^0.25

As,

N_u= hd/k

Replacing this into our equation,

hd/k=0.53〖(αp^2 d^3 (T_1-T_f )g)/μ^2 〗^0.25 〖(C_p μ)/k〗^0.25
Rearranging,

h=k/d 0.53〖(αp^2 d^3 (T_1-T_f )g)/μ^2 〗^0.25 〖(C_p μ)/k〗^0.25

Distributing through the exponents,

Struggling to figure this one out. Any assistance is appreciated.

I know I have to Distribute though the terms. Just a little unsure in what order to carry our the operations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tiberious said:
Just a little unsure in what order to carry our the operations
Shouldn't matter ! So, please continue!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tiberious
Thank-you for your hasty reply.

So, do I multiply each term by the power of 0.25. Apologies, I've been staring at this for ages and am at a loss.
 
You have ##\Delta T^{0.25}## already. ##(d^3)^{0.25}## and ## 1/d ## give you the expected power of ##d##. The remainder is numerical.
 
Does this seem correct as the next stage ? Or, do we multiply each term ?

h= (2.816∙10^(-5))/d 0.53〖(〖3.077∙10^(-3 )∙1.086〗^2 d^3 (T_s-T_f )9.81)/〖1.962∙10^(-5)〗^2 〗^0.25 〖(1.0063∙1.962∙10^(-5))/(2.816∙10^(-5) )〗^0.25
 
Try it and see where it takes you;
the end of the tunnel is that you want to end up at 1.34
 
Okay - I've found my way to the below. Now I'm stuck.

0.0044h= (2.816∙10^(-5))/d 0.53((0.2355)∙(1.042) d^0.75 (T_s-T_f )^0.25 1.7698)(0.915)
 
What is the problem ?
Lump all the numbers in one and I do hope you know what ##d^{0.75}/d## is ?
 
BvU - Thanks.

I got to the below eventually..

h=1.34 (T_s-T_f )^0.25/d^0.25

From this we can derive that,

h ≈1.34((T_s-T_f)/d)^0.25
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K