Heat Transfer and mass flow rate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the mass flow rate of coolant in a cooling system for six diesel engines, each with a power output of 55 kW. The engines operate at a thermal efficiency of 30%, resulting in a heat transfer of 99 kW to the coolant. Using the steady flow energy equation, the calculated mass flow rate of the coolant is approximately 1.57 kg/s. The discussion also addresses assumptions regarding the cooling water feed and the importance of maintaining fluid separation to prevent corrosion and fouling in the engine cooling system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of steady flow energy equations (SFEE)
  • Knowledge of heat exchanger principles
  • Familiarity with thermal efficiency calculations
  • Basic concepts of cooling tower operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and operation of heat exchangers in cooling systems
  • Learn about thermal efficiency calculations for diesel engines
  • Investigate the impact of cooling tower design on cooling efficiency
  • Explore methods to prevent corrosion and fouling in engine cooling systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, mechanical technicians, and anyone involved in the design and maintenance of cooling systems for diesel engines will benefit from this discussion.

mrcleanhair
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, wondered if anyone can give me a pointer on this problem I am working on.

6 Diesel engines each with power 55kW running, given output cooling water temperature of 80°C, and required return temp of 60°C. The coolant is to be fed through a heat exchanger, with the heat exchanger outlet to be cooled via evaporative cooling from small cooling tower.

Since I have Tout and Tin for the Heat EX/Engine loop, I can use steady flow energy eq to find mass flow, once I have made assumptions of thermal efficiency of engines, (30% of heat energy transferred to coolant),

55*6=330 @30% = 99kW
Cp water @ 80°C = 4.196kJ/kg

Q=mcpDT, so rearranging gives 99/(4.196*(80-65) = 1.57kg/s (heat energy transferred to coolant)

Then, I am assuming a mains water feed to heat ex, with average assumed values;
Cold side inlet temp: 10°C
Cp water @10°C: 4.192kJ/kg
Mains feed at 3l per min (0.051kg/s)

Using SFEE and rearranging mh*Cph*(80-65)=mh*Cpc*(T4-10)

10+(1.57*4.196*15)/(0.051*4.192)=472.2

I am clearly missing something fundamental, as even I know that is totally incorrect. Any helpis hugely appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understood well, the lost heat (30%) is transferred in the coolant (water) and the coolant passes through a heat ex, cooled down to 60°C and then returns again to the engines [cold side: cooling water (from cooling tower) and hot side: the coolant (water)].
Is this right?

I also have some questions:
Why did you write (80-65) and not (80-60)?
Why did you assume so low feed for cooling water? As long as they contain water, both sides of the heat ex have almost the same Cp. I think you must consider T4 to be the biggest accepted value for the returned cooling water temperature (depends on the design of cooling tower and the weather conditions). Then you can find minimum mc.
 
Hi,

Appreciate the reply. Apologies, typo on my part. Delta T is 15 degrees.

The cooling water is circulating from the engines, through the heat ex and returning to the engines water jacket at 65 degrees.

The cooling tower system is used to cool the output of the heat exchanger. I assume this is to keep fluids separate in the system.

I will look again at my assumptions of flow rate of mains water feed.

Many thanks.
 
Hi too,

Ok.

The reason why the cooling water does not enter directly the jacket of the engines is because it may contain small amounts of substances that can cause or promote corrosion/fouling/growth of microorganisms (although additives have already been added in the cooling tower to avoid this situation). If one of these cases occurs, then the damage (functional and economical) will be great because the engines are expensive.

You can also use a typical cooling tower's ΔT, in order to get an idea of the mains water feed's order of magnitude.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
3K